2.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
1.5 sec
147 ms
Welcome to rima.org homepage info - get ready to check RIMA best content for Mexico right away, or after learning these important things about rima.org
Visit rima.orgWe analyzed Rima.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
rima.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
1059 ms
190 ms
8 ms
28 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Rima.org, 1% (1 request) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rima.org.
Page size can be reduced by 311.6 kB (45%)
699.2 kB
387.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Rima.org main page is 699.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 335.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RIMA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 234.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 234.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rima.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (30%)
80
56
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RIMA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rima.org
1059 ms
www.rima.org
190 ms
RimaLib.js
8 ms
RimaAjaxFramework.js
28 ms
urchin.js
62 ms
google_analytics.js
27 ms
reset-min.css
37 ms
rima.css
39 ms
colorbox.css
36 ms
carrousel.css
36 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
jquery.tinycarousel.min.js
33 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
39 ms
Default.css
39 ms
WebResource.axd
43 ms
ScriptResource.axd
49 ms
ScriptResource.axd
43 ms
dc.js
157 ms
prum.min.js
86 ms
logo_rima.jpg
63 ms
logo_ops_rima-esp.jpg
31 ms
flag_spain.jpg
12 ms
flag_portugal.jpg
13 ms
flag_brasil.jpg
14 ms
bg_menu.gif
12 ms
arrow_menu.png
27 ms
arrow_login.gif
28 ms
arrow_gray.gif
27 ms
logo_Verisign2.jpg
29 ms
arrow_cyan.gif
34 ms
ImagenPortal.ashx
59 ms
arrow_white.gif
30 ms
001.jpg
31 ms
002.jpg
33 ms
003.jpg
34 ms
004.jpg
37 ms
005.jpg
40 ms
006.jpg
39 ms
007.jpg
38 ms
008.jpg
38 ms
009.jpg
44 ms
010.jpg
43 ms
011.jpg
40 ms
012.jpg
43 ms
013.jpg
45 ms
016.jpg
49 ms
017.jpg
48 ms
020.jpg
45 ms
021.jpg
47 ms
019.jpg
48 ms
018.jpg
56 ms
023.jpg
52 ms
024.jpg
49 ms
025.jpg
53 ms
022.jpg
55 ms
039.jpg
50 ms
026.jpg
52 ms
032.jpg
51 ms
029.jpg
46 ms
036.jpg
43 ms
033.jpg
39 ms
030.jpg
40 ms
028.jpg
41 ms
038.jpg
39 ms
034.jpg
40 ms
037.jpg
40 ms
027.jpg
38 ms
035.jpg
37 ms
041.jpg
38 ms
031.jpg
36 ms
045.jpg
36 ms
042.jpg
39 ms
043.jpg
37 ms
044.jpg
36 ms
047.jpg
37 ms
046.jpg
38 ms
049.jpg
34 ms
048.jpg
35 ms
logo_rima_small.png
36 ms
loading.gif
38 ms
bg_orange.gif
34 ms
controls.png
35 ms
rima.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rima.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rima.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rima.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rima.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rima.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RIMA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: