Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rimontgo.de

RIMONTGÓ: Luxus-Immobilien in Spanien seit 1959 | Forbes Global Properties

Page Load Speed

9.9 sec in total

First Response

310 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

3.2 sec

rimontgo.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rimontgo.de homepage info - get ready to check Rimontgo best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about rimontgo.de

RIMONTGÓ Luxus-Immobilien, führend in Spanien seit 1959. Spezialisiert auf exklusive Immobilien, assoziiert mit Forbes Global Properties. Niederlassungen in Valencia, Jávea, Marbella, Mallorca und Bar...

Visit rimontgo.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Rimontgo.de page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rimontgo.de performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,100 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rimontgo.de

310 ms

www.rimontgo.de

888 ms

A.bootstrap.min.css.pagespeed.cf.wP5rTrSGaD.css

237 ms

css,_style.css+css,_jquery,_jquery-ui.min.css+pages,_home,_home.css+css,_sprites,_spritesHome_DE.css+css,_sprites,_spritesMenuSuperior_DE.css+plugins,_bodyHead,_bodyHead.css+css,_sprites,_spritesBuscadores_DE.css+plugins,_propertySearchTopMovil,_propertySearchTopMovil.css+plugins,_propertySearchTop,_propertySearchTop.css+plugins,_sliderHome,_sliderHome.css+plugins,_bodyBeforeFooter,_bodyBeforeFooter.css+plugins,_bodyFooter,_bodyFooter.css+css,_sprites,_spritesTools40_DE.css+plugins,_tell_a_friend,_tell_a_friend.css+plugins,_tools,_tools.css+plugins,_backTop,_backTop.css+css,_sprites,_spritesCookies_DE.css+plugins,_cookies,_cookies.css+plugins,_web_forms,_web_forms.css.pagespeed.cc.q2XFun_BIT.css

350 ms

plusone.js

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Rimontgo.de, 57% (37 requests) were made to Images.rimontgo.de and 12% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Images.rimontgo.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 572.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Rimontgo.de main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 86.2 kB

  • Original 104.8 kB
  • After minification 104.8 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5.5 MB
  • After minification 5.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rimontgo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 299.4 kB

  • Original 442.3 kB
  • After minification 441.1 kB
  • After compression 143.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 299.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 186.6 kB

  • Original 222.7 kB
  • After minification 197.8 kB
  • After compression 36.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rimontgo.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 186.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (19%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

46

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rimontgo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rimontgo.de accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rimontgo.de best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rimontgo.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rimontgo.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rimontgo.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rimontgo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: