3.8 sec in total
412 ms
3.3 sec
135 ms
Welcome to ringler.de homepage info - get ready to check Ringler best content right away, or after learning these important things about ringler.de
IBR Leiterplatten GmbH & Co. KG – 30 Jahre IBR seit 1989 ✔️preiswert ✓ freundlich ✓ kompetent ✓ Kleinserien & Serien ✓ ➔ Jetzt informieren!
Visit ringler.deWe analyzed Ringler.de page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ringler.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
412 ms
1140 ms
64 ms
99 ms
199 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ringler.de, 96% (78 requests) were made to Ibr-leiterplatten.de and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Ibr-leiterplatten.de.
Page size can be reduced by 90.1 kB (8%)
1.1 MB
988.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ringler.de main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 398.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ringler images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 439 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ringler.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (76%)
71
17
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ringler. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ringler.de
412 ms
www.ibr-leiterplatten.de
1140 ms
js
64 ms
style.min.css
99 ms
plyr.css
199 ms
ibr_warenkorb.css
282 ms
js_composer.min.css
479 ms
animate.min.css
298 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
402 ms
post-34878.css
308 ms
elementor.min.css
302 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
380 ms
elementor-extend.min.css
407 ms
jquery.min.js
411 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
417 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
505 ms
plyr.js
506 ms
ibr_warenkorb.min.js
506 ms
raphael.min.js
514 ms
app.js
505 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
534 ms
iconlist.min.css
577 ms
v4-shims.min.css
576 ms
all.min.css
611 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
608 ms
icons.min.css
610 ms
alert.min.css
620 ms
share.min.css
689 ms
theme.min.css
825 ms
dynamic_vars.min.css
737 ms
post-35241.css
739 ms
post-35248.css
738 ms
post-37683.css
739 ms
style.css
823 ms
all.min.css
842 ms
icons.min.css
841 ms
alpha-google-fonts.css
844 ms
swiper.min.css
845 ms
style.css
866 ms
rs6.css
870 ms
rbtools.min.js
837 ms
rs6.min.js
773 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
685 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
683 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
678 ms
framework.min.js
624 ms
framework-async.min.js
746 ms
post-like.min.js
663 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
669 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
682 ms
theme.min.js
630 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
643 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
753 ms
waypoints.min.js
675 ms
gtm.js
37 ms
app.css
117 ms
widget
269 ms
core.min.js
663 ms
frontend.min.js
699 ms
logoV4_500.png
594 ms
p1-300x300.png
688 ms
de.gif
638 ms
eu.gif
644 ms
cn.gif
677 ms
fl_ibr.png
695 ms
buerstm.jpg
734 ms
blau.jpg
643 ms
lami.jpg
649 ms
galv.jpg
690 ms
lenz.jpg
625 ms
displ.jpg
611 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
644 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
732 ms
alpha.ttf
704 ms
iso_ul3.png
704 ms
ipc-fed.gif
728 ms
consent
219 ms
udesign.ttf
675 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
697 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
650 ms
details
118 ms
ringler.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ringler.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ringler.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ringler.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ringler.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ringler.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ringler. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: