Tools & Wizards About Us
ringlift.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

ringlift.no

Forside - Ringerike Liftutleie

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

671 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

270 ms

ringlift.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ringlift content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ringlift.no

Ringerike Liftutleie tilbyr et stort spekter av lifter, trucker og minikraner. Med over 45 års erfaring i bransjen og over 300 maskiner, hjelper vi kundene

Visit ringlift.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Ringlift.no page load time and found that the first response time was 671 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ringlift.no performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ringlift.no

671 ms

analytics.js

26 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

110 ms

bootstrap.min.css

296 ms

font-awesome.min.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Ringlift.no, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) belongs to the original domain Ringlift.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 609.8 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

659.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ringlift.no main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 490.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 35.2 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 40.1 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 490.3 kB
  • After minification 470.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ringlift images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 249.8 kB

  • Original 368.9 kB
  • After minification 367.5 kB
  • After compression 119.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 305.4 kB

  • Original 366.1 kB
  • After minification 357.7 kB
  • After compression 60.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ringlift.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 305.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (67%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ringlift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ringlift.no

ringlift.no

671 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

26 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

110 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

296 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

195 ms

magnificpopup.min.css

magnificpopup.min.css

201 ms

grid-extended.min.css

grid-extended.min.css

216 ms

themeblvd.min.css

themeblvd.min.css

327 ms

front.css

front.css

219 ms

style.css

style.css

292 ms

footable.core.min.css

footable.core.min.css

302 ms

gravityforms.min.css

gravityforms.min.css

323 ms

theme.css

theme.css

344 ms

base.css

base.css

386 ms

style.css

style.css

387 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

503 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

429 ms

front.js

front.js

430 ms

flexslider.min.js

flexslider.min.js

434 ms

nivo.min.js

nivo.min.js

481 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

483 ms

magnificpopup.min.js

magnificpopup.min.js

537 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

536 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

542 ms

easypiechart.min.js

easypiechart.min.js

575 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

580 ms

themeblvd.min.js

themeblvd.min.js

601 ms

footable.min.js

footable.min.js

640 ms

footable.sort.min.js

footable.sort.min.js

643 ms

footable.filter.min.js

footable.filter.min.js

647 ms

footable.paginate.min.js

footable.paginate.min.js

670 ms

theme.js

theme.js

674 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

700 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

easy-table.css

easy-table.css

461 ms

ring_lift_logo_oransj.png

ring_lift_logo_oransj.png

211 ms

forside_ringerike_liftutleie_01.jpg

forside_ringerike_liftutleie_01.jpg

384 ms

bomlift_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

bomlift_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

197 ms

knekkarmlift_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

knekkarmlift_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

125 ms

terrenglift_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

terrenglift_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

108 ms

tilhengermontert_lift_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

tilhengermontert_lift_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

219 ms

sakselift_diesel_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

sakselift_diesel_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

205 ms

sakselift_elektrisk_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

sakselift_elektrisk_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

234 ms

teleskoptruck_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

teleskoptruck_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

290 ms

beltkran_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

beltkran_kategoribilde-640x360.jpg

304 ms

kategoribilde_diverse_utstyr-640x360.jpg

kategoribilde_diverse_utstyr-640x360.jpg

315 ms

startbank-logo_351x77.png

startbank-logo_351x77.png

326 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

332 ms

Accessibility Review

ringlift.no accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ringlift.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ringlift.no SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ringlift.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ringlift.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ringlift.no

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ringlift. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: