Tools & Wizards About Us
rinova.me screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rinova.me

Rinova | Second-hand packaging machines from the Marchesini Group

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

369 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

971 ms

rinova.me screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rinova content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rinova.me

Rinova offers second-hand or refurbished packaging machines: a long production life solution guaranteed by the Marchesini Group’s highest quality standards.

Visit rinova.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Rinova.me page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rinova.me performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rinova.me

369 ms

www.rinova.me

1404 ms

gtm.js

109 ms

uc.js

172 ms

modernizr.custom.js

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Rinova.me, 9% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rinova.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 734.1 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rinova.me main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 118.4 kB

  • Original 150.1 kB
  • After minification 141.0 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rinova images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 325.3 kB

  • Original 527.1 kB
  • After minification 520.4 kB
  • After compression 201.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 325.3 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 263.2 kB

  • Original 301.3 kB
  • After minification 254.4 kB
  • After compression 38.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rinova.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 263.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (64%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rinova. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rinova.me

rinova.me

369 ms

www.rinova.me

www.rinova.me

1404 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

109 ms

uc.js

uc.js

172 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

157 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

496 ms

styles.css

styles.css

580 ms

style.css

style.css

907 ms

editor-style.css

editor-style.css

582 ms

js

js

190 ms

index.js

index.js

581 ms

index.js

index.js

579 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

152 ms

js

js

340 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

744 ms

main.js

main.js

677 ms

api.js

api.js

188 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

673 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

716 ms

index.js

index.js

673 ms

js

js

55 ms

configuration.js

configuration.js

420 ms

cc.js

cc.js

231 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

67 ms

bc-v4.min.html

bc-v4.min.html

94 ms

logo_rinova.png

logo_rinova.png

323 ms

focus_hp_1.jpg

focus_hp_1.jpg

401 ms

box2-home.png

box2-home.png

981 ms

contact_us.jpg

contact_us.jpg

991 ms

rinova-satisfied-the-needs-of-the-Lutticke-customer-455x360.jpg

rinova-satisfied-the-needs-of-the-Lutticke-customer-455x360.jpg

504 ms

rinova-ha-soddisfatto-le-esigenze-del-cliente-Signorini-Medicale-455x360.jpg

rinova-ha-soddisfatto-le-esigenze-del-cliente-Signorini-Medicale-455x360.jpg

442 ms

lets-compare-rinova-with-its-competitors-455x360.jpg

lets-compare-rinova-with-its-competitors-455x360.jpg

493 ms

close.png

close.png

540 ms

2424179627602283

2424179627602283

51 ms

,

,

71 ms

css

css

62 ms

js

js

391 ms

top_image_hp.jpg

top_image_hp.jpg

312 ms

top_hp_cover.png

top_hp_cover.png

304 ms

arrow_top.png

arrow_top.png

302 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

306 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

305 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

306 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

141 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

135 ms

Accessibility Review

rinova.me accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rinova.me best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rinova.me SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rinova.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rinova.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rinova.me

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rinova. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: