2.9 sec in total
453 ms
2.2 sec
239 ms
Welcome to rio.edu homepage info - get ready to check Rio best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rio.edu
Join the Rio Family
Visit rio.eduWe analyzed Rio.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 453 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rio.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value14.2 s
1/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.677
8/100
15%
Value31.6 s
0/100
10%
453 ms
40 ms
42 ms
37 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Rio.edu, 17% (19 requests) were made to Um.simpli.fi and 4% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (453 ms) belongs to the original domain Rio.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 354.5 kB (33%)
1.1 MB
734.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rio.edu main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 621.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 107.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.3 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 193.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rio.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 193.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (59%)
85
35
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.cfm
453 ms
cs-public.v2.css
40 ms
grid700_260.css
42 ms
screen.css
37 ms
modules-components.css
37 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
38 ms
jquery.min.js
83 ms
jquery.pstrength.min.1.2.js
38 ms
ufo.js
49 ms
head.min.js
54 ms
pjd0qwj.js
177 ms
satelliteLib-dc9399ab9e38469ed2b64fcf7514eccb79cd4748.js
101 ms
jquery.innerfadeV2.js
43 ms
jquery.jcarousel.pack.js
40 ms
reset_v2.css
15 ms
lightbox.css
15 ms
dv-tools.css
30 ms
cs-shared.v2.css
35 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
16 ms
scripts.js
15 ms
p.gif
155 ms
pjd0qwj-i.css
128 ms
cse.js
39 ms
body-bg.png
37 ms
search-btn.png
31 ms
icon-email.png
32 ms
icon-login.png
32 ms
icon-bb.png
31 ms
logo.png
32 ms
educationgrantbanner.jpg
101 ms
teacheroftheyearbanner-nowv.jpg
95 ms
championswebbanner2.jpg
91 ms
apply-home.jpg
32 ms
financial-aid-home.jpg
44 ms
programs-degrees-home.jpg
44 ms
visit-home.jpg
90 ms
1madog-148x148.jpg
90 ms
library-slider.jpg
91 ms
bookstore-slider.jpg
99 ms
strategicplan-slider.jpg
91 ms
2014AnnualReport-slider.jpg
92 ms
Greer-Museum-slider.jpg
97 ms
sense-slider.jpg
97 ms
fww-slider.jpg
96 ms
catalog-slider.jpg
98 ms
sp-slider.jpg
127 ms
logo-footer.png
127 ms
social-facebook-32.png
126 ms
social-twitter-32.png
127 ms
social-youtube-32.png
127 ms
innerfade-arrows.png
105 ms
innerfade-desc.png
115 ms
rss-icon-xsmall.png
115 ms
cse.js
102 ms
pjd0qwj-i-32239323-6852.eot
197 ms
pjd0qwj-i-32239323-6851.eot
202 ms
siteanalyze_48427.js
197 ms
dpx.js
79 ms
r.js
119 ms
ga.js
50 ms
horz-carousel-left-btn.png
52 ms
horz-carousel-right-btn.png
53 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
p
16 ms
jsapi
39 ms
collect
65 ms
dpx
4 ms
dpx
5 ms
match_redirect
13 ms
match_redirect
12 ms
g.js
65 ms
default+en.css
14 ms
default+en.I.js
26 ms
tpid=DA29559E42B9D4561A7139A90244847E
17 ms
29931
44 ms
lr
6 ms
default.css
24 ms
match_redirect
5 ms
sync
14 ms
t.gif
7 ms
match_redirect
4 ms
DA29559E42B9D4561A7139A90244847E
52 ms
image.aspx
108 ms
match_redirect
3 ms
ProfilesEngineServlet
25 ms
lr.gif
8 ms
ProfilesEngineServlet
26 ms
exelate
4 ms
match_redirect
4 ms
engine
89 ms
tap.php
247 ms
18 ms
17 ms
17 ms
spotx_match
4 ms
fb_match
4 ms
u.php
74 ms
an
4 ms
lj_match
4 ms
merge
4 ms
cw_match
6 ms
rb_match
10 ms
rtset
25 ms
tap.php
368 ms
ox_match
3 ms
sd
26 ms
pm_match
3 ms
Pug
49 ms
pixel
19 ms
g_match
4 ms
match_redirect
3 ms
pixel
46 ms
aa_px
4 ms
rio.edu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rio.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rio.edu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rio.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rio.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rio.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: