Tools & Wizards About Us
ripm.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

ripm.org

Répertoire international de la presse musicale / Retrospective Index to Music Periodicals

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

64 ms

ripm.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ripm.org homepage info - get ready to check Ripm best content right away, or after learning these important things about ripm.org

RIPM. Répertoire international de la presse musicale. Retrospective Index to Music Periodicals. Full-Text Music Periodicals from ca. 1750 to 1966. Jazz Periodicals

Visit ripm.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ripm.org page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ripm.org performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ripm.org

105 ms

ripm.org

110 ms

style.css

23 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

22 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Ripm.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (214 ms) relates to the external source Cnc.ripm.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 148.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

967.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ripm.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 22.0 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 130.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 937.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ripm needs image optimization as it can save up to 130.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 8.6 kB
  • After minification 8.4 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ripm.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (59%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ripm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ripm.org

ripm.org

105 ms

ripm.org

ripm.org

110 ms

style.css

style.css

23 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

22 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

27 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

36 ms

address.css

address.css

25 ms

announcement.css

announcement.css

49 ms

cnc.css

cnc.css

68 ms

editors.css

editors.css

69 ms

features.css

features.css

70 ms

footnotes.css

footnotes.css

71 ms

forms.css

forms.css

74 ms

header.css

header.css

73 ms

headings.css

headings.css

90 ms

home.css

home.css

93 ms

icons.css

icons.css

94 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

95 ms

memoriam.css

memoriam.css

96 ms

menu.css

menu.css

97 ms

publications.css

publications.css

114 ms

sponsors.css

sponsors.css

116 ms

tables.css

tables.css

116 ms

terms.css

terms.css

118 ms

thumbnails.css

thumbnails.css

119 ms

trialfeatured.css

trialfeatured.css

121 ms

twoseries.css

twoseries.css

136 ms

narrow_style.css

narrow_style.css

138 ms

cnc.ripmapps.org

cnc.ripmapps.org

151 ms

www.cnc.ripm.org

www.cnc.ripm.org

214 ms

ga.js

ga.js

70 ms

ripm_logo.png

ripm_logo.png

73 ms

Now-Available635_1box-enl1.gif

Now-Available635_1box-enl1.gif

77 ms

CMM.png

CMM.png

151 ms

mfr.png

mfr.png

122 ms

rpe.png

rpe.png

100 ms

rem.png

rem.png

104 ms

JUE.png

JUE.png

172 ms

gmm.png

gmm.png

123 ms

ripm_jazz_covers2.png

ripm_jazz_covers2.png

190 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

ripm.org accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ripm.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ripm.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripm.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ripm.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ripm.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ripm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: