Tools & Wizards About Us
ripol.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

ripol.ru

Издательство Рипол Классик

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

849 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

278 ms

ripol.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit ripol.ru now to see the best up-to-date Ripol content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ripol.ru

Официальный сайт издательства «Рипол Классик»

Visit ripol.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Ripol.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 849 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ripol.ru performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value890 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.285

42/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ripol.ru

849 ms

bootstrap.min.css

690 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

236 ms

slick.css

238 ms

slick-theme.css

240 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Ripol.ru, 5% (2 requests) were made to Vk.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ripol.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 482.3 kB (59%)

Content Size

820.2 kB

After Optimization

337.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ripol.ru main page is 820.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 469.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 40.3 kB

  • Original 47.9 kB
  • After minification 35.6 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.4 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 93.1 kB
  • After minification 88.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ripol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 260.9 kB

  • Original 469.4 kB
  • After minification 456.4 kB
  • After compression 208.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 260.9 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 176.6 kB

  • Original 209.8 kB
  • After minification 202.5 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ripol.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 176.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (39%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ripol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ripol.ru

ripol.ru

849 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

690 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

236 ms

slick.css

slick.css

238 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

240 ms

style.css

style.css

361 ms

logo-ripol.svg

logo-ripol.svg

354 ms

search-button.svg

search-button.svg

352 ms

tg.svg

tg.svg

358 ms

vk.svg

vk.svg

469 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

469 ms

lc.svg

lc.svg

473 ms

favorites.svg

favorites.svg

477 ms

item_2744.mp4

item_2744.mp4

1200 ms

small_item_2744.mp4

small_item_2744.mp4

1296 ms

small_item_3400.jpg

small_item_3400.jpg

723 ms

small_item_3394.webp

small_item_3394.webp

479 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

719 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

606 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

683 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

821 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

716 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

797 ms

jquery.mask.js

jquery.mask.js

835 ms

fslightbox.js

fslightbox.js

839 ms

script.js

script.js

911 ms

script.js

script.js

938 ms

small_item_3392.webp

small_item_3392.webp

954 ms

small_item_3391.jpg

small_item_3391.jpg

959 ms

small_item_3390.webp

small_item_3390.webp

1026 ms

small_item_3389.webp

small_item_3389.webp

1057 ms

small_item_3388.jpg

small_item_3388.jpg

1078 ms

small_item_3387.jpg

small_item_3387.jpg

1081 ms

logo-ripol-white.svg

logo-ripol-white.svg

1140 ms

logo-ripol-child-white.svg

logo-ripol-child-white.svg

1175 ms

eye.png

eye.png

614 ms

Montserrat-Regular.ttf

Montserrat-Regular.ttf

598 ms

Montserrat-Bold.ttf

Montserrat-Bold.ttf

838 ms

tag.js

tag.js

1033 ms

search-input.svg

search-input.svg

121 ms

openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js

openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js

256 ms

cross.svg

cross.svg

120 ms

rtrg

rtrg

142 ms

Accessibility Review

ripol.ru accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ripol.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ripol.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripol.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ripol.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ripol.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ripol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: