Tools & Wizards About Us
rippital.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rippital.com

Default Web Site Page

Page Load Speed

735 ms in total

First Response

290 ms

Resources Loaded

394 ms

Page Rendered

51 ms

rippital.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rippital.com homepage info - get ready to check Rippital best content right away, or after learning these important things about rippital.com

Visit rippital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rippital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 445 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rippital.com performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.121

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rippital.com

290 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

55 ms

rum

1 ms

rum

1 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rippital.com, 25% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (290 ms) belongs to the original domain Rippital.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

248.4 kB

After Optimization

195.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rippital.com main page is 248.4 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 199 B

  • Original 629 B
  • After minification 628 B
  • After compression 430 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 199 B or 32% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rippital needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 45.6 kB

  • Original 220.9 kB
  • After minification 220.9 kB
  • After compression 175.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.6 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rippital. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

rippital.com

rippital.com

290 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

55 ms

rum

rum

1 ms

rum

rum

1 ms

Accessibility Review

rippital.com accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rippital.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rippital.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rippital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rippital.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rippital.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rippital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: