5.2 sec in total
339 ms
4.1 sec
754 ms
Visit ripplefox.com now to see the best up-to-date Ripple Fox content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ripplefox.com
RippleFox,始于2014年的去中心化交易所
Visit ripplefox.comWe analyzed Ripplefox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ripplefox.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value25.2 s
0/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
339 ms
909 ms
582 ms
596 ms
448 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ripplefox.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ripplefox.com.
Page size can be reduced by 24.6 kB (80%)
30.9 kB
6.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ripplefox.com main page is 30.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 30.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (19%)
42
34
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ripple Fox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ripplefox.com
339 ms
ripplefox.com
909 ms
bootstrap.min.css
582 ms
font-awesome.min.css
596 ms
carousel.css
448 ms
navbar-fixed-top.css
446 ms
ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js
448 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
901 ms
bootstrap-3.1.1.min.js
599 ms
ripple-0.7.36-min.js
1480 ms
ripple-0.7.35-min.js
510 ms
validate.js
586 ms
main-bg.gif
448 ms
logo_ripplefox.png
448 ms
head_bg1.jpg
550 ms
head_bg2.jpg
714 ms
head_bg3.jpg
1163 ms
cny.png
587 ms
ripple.png
592 ms
stellar.png
696 ms
down_bg.png
734 ms
beautyofpayment.png
2067 ms
gateway.png
1134 ms
mm.png
1149 ms
btc38.png
880 ms
delta.png
1499 ms
rock.png
1151 ms
bitstamp.png
1281 ms
snapswap.png
1297 ms
ripplechina.png
1298 ms
rippleextokyo.png
1309 ms
tokyojpy.png
1427 ms
digitalgatejp.png
1442 ms
gatehub.png
1443 ms
xnftrading.png
1456 ms
bowenpay.png
1625 ms
btc38.png
1627 ms
delta.png
2215 ms
bowen_qrcode.png
1900 ms
xnftrading.png
1828 ms
qqgroup.png
1720 ms
weibo.png
1735 ms
tieba.png
1871 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
2018 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2161 ms
taobao.png
1930 ms
ripplefox.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ripplefox.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ripplefox.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripplefox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ripplefox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ripplefox.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ripple Fox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: