Tools & Wizards About Us
ripstone.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ripstone.com

Ripstone | Developer. Publisher. Team Player

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

346 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

401 ms

ripstone.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ripstone content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ripstone.com

Drag for more

Visit ripstone.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ripstone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ripstone.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,370 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ripstone.com

346 ms

ripstone.com

122 ms

qhb4ywm.css

113 ms

script.js

56 ms

theme.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Ripstone.com, 16% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) belongs to the original domain Ripstone.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 150.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ripstone.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 74.5 kB

  • Original 118.3 kB
  • After minification 104.4 kB
  • After compression 43.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.5 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 76.2 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ripstone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 65.2 kB
  • After minification 65.2 kB
  • After compression 65.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (12%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ripstone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ripstone.com

ripstone.com

346 ms

ripstone.com

ripstone.com

122 ms

qhb4ywm.css

qhb4ywm.css

113 ms

script.js

script.js

56 ms

theme.css

theme.css

46 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

44 ms

app.js

app.js

260 ms

js

js

94 ms

p.css

p.css

36 ms

Camera-1-Photo-DSC00719-390x485.jpg

Camera-1-Photo-DSC00719-390x485.jpg

162 ms

Echo-Arena-Liverpool-390x485.jpeg

Echo-Arena-Liverpool-390x485.jpeg

87 ms

BasiaKrasowska_Ripstone_LaunchParty-218-1-390x485.jpg

BasiaKrasowska_Ripstone_LaunchParty-218-1-390x485.jpg

123 ms

1-390x485.png

1-390x485.png

310 ms

DSC00199-scaled-1-390x485.jpg

DSC00199-scaled-1-390x485.jpg

124 ms

ArtBlogHeader1-390x338.gif

ArtBlogHeader1-390x338.gif

150 ms

BasiaKrasowska_Ripstone_Office-119-1-390x485.jpg

BasiaKrasowska_Ripstone_Office-119-1-390x485.jpg

183 ms

Puzzles_Bodyguards-sq-390x485.png

Puzzles_Bodyguards-sq-390x485.png

150 ms

PokerClubScreenshot-scaled-1-390x485.jpg

PokerClubScreenshot-scaled-1-390x485.jpg

150 ms

LMA-Glass-390x485.png

LMA-Glass-390x485.png

159 ms

ezgif.com-video-to-gif-1-390x450.gif

ezgif.com-video-to-gif-1-390x450.gif

173 ms

ErinGraphic2-390x485.jpg

ErinGraphic2-390x485.jpg

199 ms

tqg-logo.svg

tqg-logo.svg

192 ms

TQGCgame-horizontal-2560x1440_na_01_en-1-1-aspect-ratio-390-485.jpg

TQGCgame-horizontal-2560x1440_na_01_en-1-1-aspect-ratio-390-485.jpg

202 ms

Poker-Club-001-1080-1-aspect-ratio-390-485.jpg

Poker-Club-001-1080-1-aspect-ratio-390-485.jpg

199 ms

61NPKYUG8SL-1-aspect-ratio-390-485.jpg

61NPKYUG8SL-1-aspect-ratio-390-485.jpg

212 ms

f4da7c6ba404ace8aa844efcec19cd52.png

f4da7c6ba404ace8aa844efcec19cd52.png

170 ms

highresscreenshot00002__1_-1.jpg

highresscreenshot00002__1_-1.jpg

248 ms

d

d

47 ms

d

d

61 ms

d

d

60 ms

d

d

62 ms

Accessibility Review

ripstone.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ripstone.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ripstone.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripstone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ripstone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ripstone.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ripstone. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: