11.4 sec in total
4 sec
7.1 sec
257 ms
Click here to check amazing Ripstone content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ripstone.com
We're at the leading-edge of game development, pushing the envelope creatively and technically with every game we make.
Visit ripstone.comWe analyzed Ripstone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ripstone.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value20.4 s
0/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
3987 ms
77 ms
246 ms
254 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Ripstone.com, 32% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ripstone.com.
Page size can be reduced by 209.9 kB (39%)
539.2 kB
329.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ripstone.com main page is 539.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 221.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ripstone needs image optimization as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 8.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ripstone.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (74%)
31
8
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ripstone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ripstone.com
3987 ms
js
77 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
246 ms
68333154ca3361a913aadc3a30826667.css
254 ms
9e7b174d089f8636df795b7231a4ff7a.css
252 ms
1c6492a65198969cb39df45fe52e438b.css
545 ms
161cc0a7111202e69d627d17818de1c3.css
286 ms
827fff575457d5e5bb0e3ebe9cb4bcc1.css
638 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
507 ms
jquery.min.js
619 ms
a265059de373ec63f63091c06136537f.js
517 ms
aph2gjz.js
176 ms
3ead70b762ca87946d693f56237b398b.css
576 ms
497e2d8d75ee6fadab368e1c9371f931.css
822 ms
9e7403cc235183b459c0afaa644211e9.css
831 ms
2aa40c7585c703ef31d018d8c7dbcb98.css
854 ms
bd1af5ff3b66a3d92aeb6b7fbbf52b4c.css
834 ms
ed2a18c58fab11ef7eace9eadf11f4d4.js
1071 ms
a4a7abbabba97b6b6f5bc5440f1f0f57.js
1160 ms
2c4bcf84c99c01277ed1edcc33bee388.js
1376 ms
fc50caf2a070193f8a2baaaf4a4a4c28.js
1089 ms
ad6e62d5e8250790b690a79c5405a30d.js
1192 ms
instant_click.min.js
1121 ms
9134842f26bfd3629ad6871c798915a5.js
1301 ms
df2c6e3637cc7e1e604c990a56cc20f5.js
1340 ms
b9564ecb7c5bfd3f814eebcf7c0c080e.js
1352 ms
ripstone-white.svg
865 ms
dummy.png
865 ms
RTG-Logo-wht-300x140.png
1054 ms
safe_in_our_world_Logo-wht-300x140.png
1040 ms
SE-Logo-Wht-300x140.png
1044 ms
WIG-Logowht-300x140.png
1043 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf
78 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjQ.ttf
78 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjQ.ttf
89 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjQ.ttf
100 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjQ.ttf
111 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf
99 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjQ.ttf
98 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjQ.ttf
97 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjQ.ttf
96 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1192 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
31 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
34 ms
QldgNThLqRwH-OJ1UHjlKENVzkWGVkL3GZQmAwLYxYWI2qfdm7Lpp7c8WR32kg.ttf
33 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E9_C-bw.ttf
34 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf
37 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
34 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
36 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1049 ms
i
32 ms
i
30 ms
i
31 ms
i
31 ms
i
22 ms
ripstone.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ripstone.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ripstone.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripstone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ripstone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ripstone.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ripstone. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: