Tools & Wizards About Us
riptware.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

riptware.com

Riptware Web Technology – Innovative Business Trust Riptware

Page Load Speed

11.7 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

11.4 sec

Page Rendered

268 ms

riptware.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Riptware content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riptware.com

Riptware Web Technology is specialized for IT Services like Web Design and Development, Software Development,, Domain and Hosting Service etc.

Visit riptware.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Riptware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 11.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riptware.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.3

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riptware.com

52 ms

riptware.com

1702 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

739 ms

webfonts.css

738 ms

bootstrap.min.css

801 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Riptware.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Riptware.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 235.0 kB (28%)

Content Size

831.2 kB

After Optimization

596.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riptware.com main page is 831.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 279.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 85.2 kB

  • Original 105.2 kB
  • After minification 104.0 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 137.3 kB

  • Original 271.6 kB
  • After minification 134.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Riptware needs image optimization as it can save up to 137.3 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 279.7 kB
  • After minification 279.7 kB
  • After compression 270.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 174.6 kB
  • After minification 174.6 kB
  • After compression 171.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riptware.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (76%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riptware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

riptware.com

riptware.com

52 ms

riptware.com

riptware.com

1702 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

739 ms

webfonts.css

webfonts.css

738 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

801 ms

background.css

background.css

806 ms

style.css

style.css

797 ms

reset.css

reset.css

950 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1511 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

1510 ms

et-line-font.css

et-line-font.css

1548 ms

responsive-leyouts.css

responsive-leyouts.css

1563 ms

menu.css

menu.css

1542 ms

sky-forms.css

sky-forms.css

1727 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

2286 ms

cubeportfolio.min.css

cubeportfolio.min.css

2278 ms

blue.css

blue.css

2308 ms

mycustom.css

mycustom.css

2313 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

81 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

99 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

95 ms

styles.css

styles.css

2332 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

2458 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

2977 ms

style-front_end.css

style-front_end.css

2983 ms

settings.css

settings.css

3013 ms

main.css

main.css

2993 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

3047 ms

wws-public-style.css

wws-public-style.css

3153 ms

wws-public-template-1.css

wws-public-template-1.css

3701 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

91 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

100 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

96 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

3718 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

3721 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

3755 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

3795 ms

script.js

script.js

3863 ms

css

css

53 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

3653 ms

service_box_with_round_icon.css

service_box_with_round_icon.css

5185 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

58 ms

css

css

70 ms

css

css

75 ms

riptware_service_box_with_round_icon.css

riptware_service_box_with_round_icon.css

5151 ms

css

css

74 ms

style.css

style.css

3739 ms

effect_style.css

effect_style.css

3779 ms

css

css

74 ms

photon.min.js

photon.min.js

26 ms

e-202440.js

e-202440.js

31 ms

vc_openiconic.min.css

vc_openiconic.min.css

4504 ms

index.js

index.js

3912 ms

index.js

index.js

3845 ms

maxhost-main.js

maxhost-main.js

3824 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

4505 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

4522 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

4422 ms

appear.min.js

appear.min.js

3879 ms

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

4471 ms

main5.js

main5.js

4443 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

4483 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

4474 ms

css

css

18 ms

custom.js

custom.js

4354 ms

smooth-totop.js

smooth-totop.js

3837 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

4611 ms

ScrollToPlugin.js

ScrollToPlugin.js

4546 ms

custom_smooth_scroll.js

custom_smooth_scroll.js

4568 ms

jquery.inputmask.min.js

jquery.inputmask.min.js

4560 ms

wws-public-script.js

wws-public-script.js

4398 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

3915 ms

20190511_195706.png

20190511_195706.png

780 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

44 ms

user.svg

user.svg

3162 ms

go-live.png

go-live.png

1130 ms

font

font

21 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3975 ms

curry-and-ris-logo1.png

curry-and-ris-logo1.png

2342 ms

CDH-1.png

CDH-1.png

2344 ms

Screenshot_6.png

Screenshot_6.png

2340 ms

jatirkhanta.png

jatirkhanta.png

2369 ms

BD-mart.png

BD-mart.png

2386 ms

logo.png

logo.png

3055 ms

5gnet.jpg

5gnet.jpg

3043 ms

Deeshae.jpg

Deeshae.jpg

3052 ms

scroll-top-arrow.png

scroll-top-arrow.png

3124 ms

font

font

17 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

3494 ms

et-line.woff

et-line.woff

3638 ms

vc_openiconic.woff

vc_openiconic.woff

3823 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

1469 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

1465 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

1537 ms

Best-hosting-provider-Riptware-.jpg

Best-hosting-provider-Riptware-.jpg

1160 ms

Accessibility Review

riptware.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

riptware.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

riptware.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riptware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riptware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

riptware.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riptware. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: