Tools & Wizards About Us
riscape.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

riscape.eu

RISCAPE – European Research Infrastructures in the International Landscape

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

21 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

308 ms

riscape.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to riscape.eu homepage info - get ready to check RISCAPE best content right away, or after learning these important things about riscape.eu

The report Visit the Report page to read the final output of the project RISCAPE project (2017-2019) Global landscape of major research infrastructures Mapping the research infrastructure landscape Wh...

Visit riscape.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Riscape.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 21 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riscape.eu performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riscape.eu

21 ms

riscape.wordpress.com

27 ms

webfont.js

75 ms

96 ms

style.css

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Riscape.eu, 29% (8 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 25% (7 requests) were made to Riscape.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Riscape.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

978.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riscape.eu main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 902.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 84.5 kB

  • Original 107.9 kB
  • After minification 105.5 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 902.2 kB
  • After minification 901.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RISCAPE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 248 B

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 36.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 356 B

  • Original 17.9 kB
  • After minification 17.9 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riscape.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (58%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RISCAPE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

riscape.eu

riscape.eu

21 ms

riscape.wordpress.com

riscape.wordpress.com

27 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

75 ms

96 ms

style.css

style.css

101 ms

105 ms

coblocks-style.css

coblocks-style.css

95 ms

101 ms

97 ms

global.css

global.css

98 ms

101 ms

view.min.js

view.min.js

102 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

100 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

100 ms

99 ms

w.js

w.js

104 ms

css

css

58 ms

eb29a-screen-shot-2019-12-30-at-14.31.49.png

eb29a-screen-shot-2019-12-30-at-14.31.49.png

367 ms

g.gif

g.gif

27 ms

g.gif

g.gif

25 ms

g.gif

g.gif

25 ms

cropped-cropped-twitter_banner_riscape_01-1.jpg

cropped-cropped-twitter_banner_riscape_01-1.jpg

89 ms

RISCAPE2.png

RISCAPE2.png

1338 ms

TWITTER_BANNER_RISCAPE_01-1.jpg

TWITTER_BANNER_RISCAPE_01-1.jpg

87 ms

5ba0b-cattura-1.png

5ba0b-cattura-1.png

166 ms

Screen-Shot-2017-05-04-at-12.21.35.png

Screen-Shot-2017-05-04-at-12.21.35.png

148 ms

actionbar.css

actionbar.css

1 ms

actionbar.js

actionbar.js

6 ms

Accessibility Review

riscape.eu accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

riscape.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

riscape.eu SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riscape.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riscape.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

riscape.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RISCAPE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: