1.4 sec in total
228 ms
889 ms
261 ms
Welcome to rishikul.com homepage info - get ready to check Rishikul best content right away, or after learning these important things about rishikul.com
Visit rishikul.comWe analyzed Rishikul.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rishikul.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value3.0 s
78/100
25%
Value3.8 s
83/100
10%
Value2,560 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
228 ms
248 ms
90 ms
74 ms
78 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rishikul.com, 76% (25 requests) were made to Static.hugedomains.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Hugedomains.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (248 ms) relates to the external source Hugedomains.com.
Page size can be reduced by 168.3 kB (42%)
397.4 kB
229.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Rishikul.com main page is 397.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 133.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rishikul images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 64.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rishikul.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (58%)
31
13
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rishikul. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rishikul.com
228 ms
domain_profile.cfm
248 ms
common.css
90 ms
v3.css
74 ms
pages_v3b.css
78 ms
styles_hd.css
80 ms
common.js
90 ms
common_v3.js
90 ms
jquery-1.5.1.min.js
89 ms
styles-new.css
89 ms
edition121114.css
103 ms
ga.js
46 ms
bg.gif
16 ms
bg2.jpg
16 ms
logo_top.png
16 ms
youtubeLocationMatters.jpg
29 ms
crown.jpg
29 ms
i_phone_blue.png
39 ms
i_i_blue.png
28 ms
footer_logo_cc.png
30 ms
footer_logo_guaranteed.png
28 ms
footer_logo_escrow.png
36 ms
footer_logo_GT.png
32 ms
counter.js
81 ms
profileVideo.cfm
246 ms
hr_882x7.png
26 ms
stars_5.png
26 ms
b_buyNow_187.png
27 ms
dots_8x1.gif
30 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
t.php
130 ms
stat.aspx
57 ms
bodyImage.cfm
212 ms
rishikul.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rishikul.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rishikul.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rishikul.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rishikul.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rishikul.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rishikul. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: