Tools & Wizards About Us
riskavert.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

riskavert.com

Gifts and Hospitality Register London | Whistleblowing Disclosure Process London |Risk Avert

Page Load Speed

9.3 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

755 ms

riskavert.com screenshot

About Website

Visit riskavert.com now to see the best up-to-date Risk Avert content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about riskavert.com

Looking for gifts and hospitality register in London? Risk Avert Limited helps optimize Whistleblowing Disclosure process, improve outcomes and augment collaboration rather efficiently and quickly.

Visit riskavert.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Riskavert.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riskavert.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.471

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riskavert.com

1854 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

234 ms

style.min.css

661 ms

classic-themes.min.css

353 ms

styles.css

367 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Riskavert.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Riskavert.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 926.7 kB (18%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riskavert.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 99.8 kB

  • Original 118.5 kB
  • After minification 115.7 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 135.3 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Risk Avert images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 243.5 kB

  • Original 577.4 kB
  • After minification 557.9 kB
  • After compression 333.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.5 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 448.1 kB

  • Original 568.3 kB
  • After minification 555.6 kB
  • After compression 120.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riskavert.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 448.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (54%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Risk Avert. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

riskavert.com

riskavert.com

1854 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

234 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

661 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

353 ms

styles.css

styles.css

367 ms

front-flex.min.css

front-flex.min.css

368 ms

style.css

style.css

657 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

494 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

621 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

625 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

1019 ms

css

css

35 ms

modernizr.custom.20170701.js

modernizr.custom.20170701.js

638 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

946 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

789 ms

sow-button-atom-d9557b3973b9-2744.css

sow-button-atom-d9557b3973b9-2744.css

722 ms

style.css

style.css

759 ms

index.js

index.js

736 ms

index.js

index.js

859 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

881 ms

build.js

build.js

1035 ms

wai-aria.js

wai-aria.js

879 ms

api.js

api.js

34 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1096 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1128 ms

index.js

index.js

1034 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

1094 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

1157 ms

public.js

public.js

1165 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

1156 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

107 ms

riskavert.com

riskavert.com

1384 ms

RiskAvert_ComWebsite2.png

RiskAvert_ComWebsite2.png

293 ms

CorporateGovernance2-1-480x187.png

CorporateGovernance2-1-480x187.png

534 ms

Health_and_Safety2-480x187.png

Health_and_Safety2-480x187.png

355 ms

RiskManagement2-1-480x187.png

RiskManagement2-1-480x187.png

427 ms

Gift_And_Hospitality_System2-480x187.png

Gift_And_Hospitality_System2-480x187.png

469 ms

Whistleblowing2-480x187.png

Whistleblowing2-480x187.png

455 ms

Case_Management_System2-1-480x187.png

Case_Management_System2-1-480x187.png

549 ms

Case_Management_System2-480x187.png

Case_Management_System2-480x187.png

624 ms

GDPR_System2-480x187.png

GDPR_System2-480x187.png

737 ms

Quality_management_and_Assurance2-480x187.png

Quality_management_and_Assurance2-480x187.png

740 ms

Health_and_Safety-480x187.png

Health_and_Safety-480x187.png

755 ms

RiskManagement2-480x187.png

RiskManagement2-480x187.png

747 ms

play_icon.svg

play_icon.svg

744 ms

dashboards-e1656378264987-210x300.png

dashboards-e1656378264987-210x300.png

923 ms

3-1.jpg

3-1.jpg

1041 ms

BackgroundAcreditations-e1657028411251.png

BackgroundAcreditations-e1657028411251.png

918 ms

background26.jpg

background26.jpg

869 ms

Risk-Management.jpg

Risk-Management.jpg

1215 ms

backgorund4-min.png

backgorund4-min.png

1025 ms

Case_Management_System.png

Case_Management_System.png

1309 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

98 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

103 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

123 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

59 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

71 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1055 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1183 ms

collect

collect

33 ms

collect

collect

101 ms

ptgrowth.ttf

ptgrowth.ttf

908 ms

Accessibility Review

riskavert.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

riskavert.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

riskavert.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riskavert.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riskavert.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

riskavert.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Risk Avert. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: