1.6 sec in total
147 ms
1.4 sec
68 ms
Visit riskskill.com now to see the best up-to-date Riskskill content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about riskskill.com
We are team of indpendent risk advisor, risk specialist, and risk management consultant who are expert in risk review, risk management, compliance and due diligence, who manage compliance with regulat...
Visit riskskill.comWe analyzed Riskskill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
riskskill.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
147 ms
56 ms
55 ms
107 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Riskskill.com, 57% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 17% (5 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (209 ms) relates to the external source Browser.sentry-cdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 530.0 kB (58%)
921.2 kB
391.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Riskskill.com main page is 921.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 461.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 344.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 344.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riskskill images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 184.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.4 kB or 40% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)
24
11
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riskskill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.riskskill.com
147 ms
minified.js
56 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
55 ms
polyfill.min.js
107 ms
js
203 ms
thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js
102 ms
main.4a2d1e74.bundle.min.js
173 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
100 ms
lodash.min.js
196 ms
react.production.min.js
172 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
175 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
195 ms
riskskill_logo_colour.png
203 ms
bundle.min.js
209 ms
7358cf3a0f88451dae457fb54d8531c3.jpg
161 ms
Making%20Notes.jpg
172 ms
Working%20Coffee.jpg
172 ms
Growth.jpg
162 ms
js
96 ms
analytics.js
87 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
36 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
25 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
21 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
20 ms
80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff
23 ms
collect
121 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
12 ms
bolt-performance
33 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
13 ms
right-arrow.svg
13 ms
riskskill.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
riskskill.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
riskskill.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riskskill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riskskill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riskskill.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riskskill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: