Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

risskov.com

Risskov - Top Hotel Offers

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

risskov.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to risskov.com homepage info - get ready to check Risskov best content for Denmark right away, or after learning these important things about risskov.com

Risskov, So cheap you can't afford to stay home. Book your holiday package with us and gain cost benefits and great service.

Visit risskov.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Risskov.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

risskov.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,380 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

risskov.com

47 ms

www.risskov.com

1405 ms

speedkit_bugfixer.js

36 ms

intren_gtm_helper.js

520 ms

cookiebotinit4.min.js

814 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Risskov.com, 38% (15 requests) were made to Raag-cdn-website-images.azureedge.net and 23% (9 requests) were made to Raag-cdn-website-gfx.azureedge.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Raag-cdn-website-images.azureedge.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 567.0 kB (84%)

Content Size

672.0 kB

After Optimization

104.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Risskov.com main page is 672.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 669.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 566.9 kB

  • Original 669.8 kB
  • After minification 665.9 kB
  • After compression 102.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 566.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 146 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Risskov images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Risskov. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

risskov.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

SEO Factors

risskov.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Risskov.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Risskov.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Risskov. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: