4.5 sec in total
182 ms
3.6 sec
733 ms
Visit ritahallum.com now to see the best up-to-date Ritahallum content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ritahallum.com
https://ritahallum.crye-leike.com/explore/featured-links
Visit ritahallum.comWe analyzed Ritahallum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ritahallum.com performance score
182 ms
1624 ms
130 ms
120 ms
121 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ritahallum.com, 80% (49 requests) were made to Ritahallum.crye-leike.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Intranet.crye-leike.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Ritahallum.crye-leike.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (64%)
2.1 MB
746.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ritahallum.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 402 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritahallum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 882.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 882.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 393.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritahallum.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 393.8 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (72%)
57
16
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritahallum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ritahallum.com
182 ms
ritahallum.crye-leike.com
1624 ms
theme-gray.css
130 ms
maps.css
120 ms
owl.carousel.css
121 ms
owl.theme.css
119 ms
owl.transitions.css
122 ms
foundation-icons.css
80 ms
jquery.js
274 ms
jquery.cookie.js
260 ms
fastclick.js
260 ms
modernizr.js
259 ms
placeholder.js
259 ms
foundation.min.js
258 ms
foundation.joyride.js
286 ms
app-smart-banner.js
286 ms
sessionvars.js
284 ms
slideshow.js
283 ms
pagination.js
283 ms
listing-view.js
290 ms
search-sort.js
533 ms
sidebar-menu.js
534 ms
popup.js
531 ms
search-simple.js
533 ms
search-va.js
531 ms
mortgage-calculator.js
534 ms
tags.js
535 ms
contact.js
534 ms
quicksearch.js
579 ms
mycryeleike-dashboard.js
580 ms
mycryeleike-emailupdates.js
581 ms
saved-searches.js
581 ms
search-form.js
590 ms
search-form-page.js
592 ms
tags-manage.js
551 ms
send-to-top.js
553 ms
BrowseDetail.js
552 ms
Map.js
553 ms
awp.js
253 ms
Directions.js
552 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
485 ms
OpenLayers.js
487 ms
css
171 ms
css
182 ms
Ab2mfs6.jpg
140 ms
image.svc
1022 ms
app-icon.png
135 ms
logo-cl-white.png
207 ms
hero-image-deck.jpg
595 ms
sellers.jpg
130 ms
buyers.jpg
129 ms
mobile-search.jpg
129 ms
mobile-app-devices.png
200 ms
logo-cl.png
188 ms
extra-footer-image.jpg
401 ms
foundation-icons.woff
74 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
154 ms
analytics.js
245 ms
image.svc
493 ms
image.svc
501 ms
collect
27 ms
ritahallum.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritahallum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ritahallum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ritahallum.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ritahallum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: