Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

ritaole.com

购够网 - 日本代购,日本煤炉,日本雅虎拍卖平台

Page Load Speed

12 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

10.6 sec

Page Rendered

321 ms

ritaole.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ritaole content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritaole.com

购够网是一家专业的日本拍卖网站,雅虎拍卖平台,专注日本代购,日拍,日本雅虎,雅虎拍卖,日本煤炉等.在日本建立仓储物流基地,专业的日语翻译客服和专业的包装团队,想了解更多关于日本雅虎海外代购,日本二手或中古奢侈品代拍的相关信息,就到购够网.

Visit ritaole.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ritaole.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ritaole.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.074

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ritaole.com

1175 ms

bootstrap.css

505 ms

color.css

340 ms

new_style.css

344 ms

nivo-slider.css

342 ms

Our browser made a total of 199 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (139 requests) were addressed to the original Ritaole.com, 12% (23 requests) were made to Market.ritaomeng.com and 7% (14 requests) were made to Gougoujp.s2.udesk.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Gougoujp.s2.udesk.cn.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (35%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Ritaole.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 882.7 kB

  • Original 975.0 kB
  • After minification 814.0 kB
  • After compression 92.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 161.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 882.7 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 168.0 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritaole images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

  • Original 215.4 kB
  • After minification 211.0 kB
  • After compression 194.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 122.0 kB
  • After minification 121.9 kB
  • After compression 105.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritaole.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (32%)

Requests Now

193

After Optimization

132

The browser has sent 193 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritaole. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ritaole.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ritaole.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ritaole.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritaole.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ritaole.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritaole. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: