3.6 sec in total
386 ms
3 sec
188 ms
Click here to check amazing Ritchie Specs content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritchiespecs.com
Search and compare thousands of equipment and truck specifications. View detailed equipment specs by model, manufacturer, type and industry
Visit ritchiespecs.comWe analyzed Ritchiespecs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 386 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ritchiespecs.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,470 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.471
18/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
386 ms
141 ms
142 ms
213 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Ritchiespecs.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Ab168104.adbutler-exciton.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Munchkin.marketo.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritchiespecs.com.
Page size can be reduced by 491.9 kB (61%)
812.8 kB
320.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Ritchiespecs.com main page is 812.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 314.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritchie Specs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 191.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 191.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 261.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritchiespecs.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 261.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (87%)
84
11
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritchie Specs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ritchiespecs.com
386 ms
node.css
141 ms
defaults.css
142 ms
system.css
213 ms
system-menus.css
144 ms
user.css
146 ms
content.css
277 ms
date.css
280 ms
content.css
288 ms
content.css
286 ms
content.css
289 ms
content.css
358 ms
content.css
420 ms
content.css
420 ms
content.css
425 ms
content.css
427 ms
content.css
427 ms
content.css
497 ms
content.css
559 ms
content.css
559 ms
content.css
566 ms
content.css
566 ms
rbmasthead.css
640 ms
default.css
634 ms
core.css
700 ms
rbwiki.css
767 ms
screen.css
1982 ms
jquery.js
869 ms
drupal.js
992 ms
date_timezone.js
994 ms
attachments.js
837 ms
drawing.js
907 ms
measurementconverter.js
978 ms
mediaviewer.js
1010 ms
searchresults.js
1044 ms
specdescriptor.js
1120 ms
ritchiespecs_mdv.js
19 ms
specification.js
1007 ms
specsearch.js
1081 ms
jquery.blockUIx.js
1096 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1059 ms
rbmasthead.js
1132 ms
autocomplete.js
1139 ms
antiScraping.js
1070 ms
marketo.js
1079 ms
ti.js
69 ms
munchkin.js
19 ms
bg_tile.gif
70 ms
logo.gif.en
150 ms
map_sm.gif
143 ms
us.gif
148 ms
123.jpg
291 ms
icon_arrow_right_small.gif
152 ms
getthumbnail
237 ms
gtm.js
21 ms
arrow_down_grey.gif
274 ms
1.gif
282 ms
7.gif
282 ms
8.gif
284 ms
3.gif
373 ms
icon_search.gif
420 ms
throbber.gif
428 ms
icon_arrow_right.gif
430 ms
rt=ifr
30 ms
app.js
245 ms
munchkin.js
16 ms
bullet_white2.gif
420 ms
icon_arrow_right.gif
422 ms
icon_arrow_right.gif
503 ms
analytics.js
3 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
47 ms
p
41 ms
czOxOQ6f8r4l4Uacwqm_6r.js
38 ms
v2
43 ms
genp=IAB+Category_Business
50 ms
dpx
6 ms
pixel
16 ms
pixel
24 ms
362248.gif
6 ms
s-3261.xgi
25 ms
match
2 ms
ca.png
162 ms
;ID=168104;size=1300x446;setID=263611;type=async;domid=placement_263611_0;place=0;pid=2781706;sw=1024;sh=768;spr=1;rnd=2781706;click=CLICK_MACRO_PLACEHOLDER
88 ms
;ID=168104;size=235x177;setID=263651;type=async;domid=placement_263651_0;place=0;pid=2781706;sw=1024;sh=768;spr=1;rnd=2781706;click=CLICK_MACRO_PLACEHOLDER
171 ms
;libID=372392
260 ms
;libID=372460
320 ms
ritchiespecs.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ritchiespecs.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ritchiespecs.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritchiespecs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritchiespecs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ritchiespecs.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritchie Specs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: