12.2 sec in total
550 ms
11 sec
618 ms
Click here to check amazing Ritengo content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritengo.ru
Visit ritengo.ruWe analyzed Ritengo.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 550 ms and then it took 11.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
ritengo.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value5.8 s
16/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
550 ms
249 ms
445 ms
449 ms
448 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Ritengo.ru, 12% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritengo.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 568.7 kB (34%)
1.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Ritengo.ru main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 172.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 132.5 kB, which is 72% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 172.8 kB or 94% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ritengo needs image optimization as it can save up to 145.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 196.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 196.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritengo.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (45%)
78
43
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritengo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ritengo.ru
550 ms
style.css
249 ms
all.css
445 ms
skin.css
449 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
448 ms
css
52 ms
css
66 ms
jquery_javascript_library.js
669 ms
jquery.js
448 ms
form.js
453 ms
z-index.js
1008 ms
jquery.main.js
1491 ms
clear-form-fields.js
1462 ms
input-type-file.js
1289 ms
g-select.js
1492 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.js
811 ms
js.js
948 ms
cities.js
1082 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1134 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
1215 ms
css
61 ms
css
88 ms
bg06.png
222 ms
bg07.png
1003 ms
bg08.png
787 ms
mask01.png
986 ms
bg_line.gif
179 ms
logo.png
1161 ms
select.png
337 ms
icon_phone.png
414 ms
icon_mail.png
558 ms
list_m.png
562 ms
bg.png
718 ms
080820131932471.png
850 ms
080820131933061.png
995 ms
080820131933201.png
2093 ms
080820131933331.png
1171 ms
080820131933471.png
1987 ms
080820131934081.png
1168 ms
tringle-slide.png
2367 ms
290820131528221.jpg
7957 ms
wind_.png
1912 ms
290820131529231.jpg
2799 ms
290820131530271.jpg
6012 ms
vl.png
2144 ms
i1.jpg
2254 ms
i2.jpg
2359 ms
i3.jpg
2420 ms
i4.jpg
2523 ms
i5.jpg
2527 ms
img_.png
3142 ms
list.jpg
2672 ms
zamerschik.jpg
2857 ms
bg_order.gif
2830 ms
021220150941141.jpg
4970 ms
bg01.png
3636 ms
021220150939311.jpg
5531 ms
121120151327081.jpg
6847 ms
watch.js
80 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
341 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
372 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
410 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
434 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
434 ms
nMvcGlU6E4hOvMdb6LrvyfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
443 ms
EgBlzoNBIHxNPCMwXaAhYPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
433 ms
QABk9IxT-LFTJ_dQzv7xpFwIJl2YiaXHM0xUx_ugXFg.ttf
433 ms
O_WhD9hODL16N4KLHLX7xS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
514 ms
03aPdn7fFF3H6ngCgAlQzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
442 ms
Foydq9xJp--nfYIx2TBz9cyqkNNn4w5IMo8BqXn2F-A.ttf
524 ms
121120151325271.jpg
6201 ms
121120151324091.jpg
6372 ms
221020151101541.jpg
7514 ms
201020151606581.jpg
6264 ms
201020151325011.jpg
7375 ms
160620151753391.jpg
6596 ms
160620151746211.jpg
6271 ms
191020142128421.jpg
6900 ms
161020141545411.jpg
6796 ms
140720141428271.jpg
6984 ms
240420141655541.jpg
7587 ms
170220141934051.jpg
7853 ms
qq_left.png
6865 ms
comm.gif
6908 ms
qq_right.png
6938 ms
bg_foot.jpg
6203 ms
up-arrow.png
6193 ms
arrow_.png
6159 ms
cr.png
6134 ms
l_l.png
6027 ms
l_r.png
5994 ms
ritengo.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
ritengo.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ritengo.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritengo.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ritengo.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ritengo.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritengo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: