Tools & Wizards About Us
ritta.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

ritta.com

RITTA | Marketing Agency for the World's Best-Known Brands

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

284 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

348 ms

ritta.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RITTA content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritta.com

The marketing firm with over 35 years' history creating the digital marketing, branding and creative services that generate growth and success in any industry.

Visit ritta.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ritta.com page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ritta.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.1 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ritta.com

284 ms

style.min.css

108 ms

styles.css

163 ms

fonts.css

276 ms

style.css

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Ritta.com, 22% (10 requests) were made to and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) relates to the external source S.adroll.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 348.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ritta.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 57.4 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 80.0 kB
  • After compression 23.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 286.2 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RITTA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 92.2 kB
  • After minification 92.2 kB
  • After compression 89.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 324.8 kB
  • After minification 324.8 kB
  • After compression 322.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritta.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (76%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RITTA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ritta.com

ritta.com

284 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

108 ms

styles.css

styles.css

163 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

276 ms

style.css

style.css

166 ms

app.css

app.css

164 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

173 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

172 ms

js

js

65 ms

index.js

index.js

126 ms

index.js

index.js

173 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

178 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

177 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

181 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

180 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

183 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

229 ms

controlgroup.min.js

controlgroup.min.js

234 ms

checkboxradio.min.js

checkboxradio.min.js

232 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

235 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

243 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

242 ms

global.js

global.js

285 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

291 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

292 ms

wp-gallery-custom-links.js

wp-gallery-custom-links.js

290 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

294 ms

C77EA2A0DB69D2356.css

C77EA2A0DB69D2356.css

230 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

84 ms

ritta_logo_stacked_KO.svg

ritta_logo_stacked_KO.svg

80 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

83 ms

instagram.svg

instagram.svg

82 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

83 ms

linkedIn.svg

linkedIn.svg

81 ms

MKGI0=

MKGI0=

27 ms

MKGI0=

MKGI0=

25 ms

HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==

HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==

24 ms

MKGI0=

MKGI0=

24 ms

HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==

HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==

24 ms

HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==

HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==

23 ms

MKGI0=

MKGI0=

23 ms

MKGI0=

MKGI0=

23 ms

HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==

HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==

22 ms

MKGI0=

MKGI0=

22 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

316 ms

Image-1@2x.jpg

Image-1@2x.jpg

277 ms

Accessibility Review

ritta.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ritta.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ritta.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritta.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritta.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ritta.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RITTA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: