Tools & Wizards About Us
ritter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

ritter.com

Midmark Medical, Dental, Vet Equipment Manufacturer & Supplier

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

884 ms

ritter.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ritter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritter.com

Midmark is a global manufacturer and supplier of healthcare products, equipment and diagnostic software for medical, veterinary, and dental markets.

Visit ritter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ritter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ritter.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.midmark.com

56 ms

www.midmark.com

132 ms

gtm.js

74 ms

5b3c3bd9.js

49 ms

main.min.css

211 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ritter.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Use.fortawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Midmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ritter.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 95.3 kB
  • After minification 72.8 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.5 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 159.9 kB
  • After minification 159.9 kB
  • After compression 108.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 149.8 kB
  • After minification 149.8 kB
  • After compression 114.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (49%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.midmark.com

www.midmark.com

56 ms

www.midmark.com

www.midmark.com

132 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

74 ms

5b3c3bd9.js

5b3c3bd9.js

49 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

211 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

456 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

472 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

499 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

494 ms

global-scripts-bundle.js

global-scripts-bundle.js

698 ms

woff.css

woff.css

13 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

573 ms

hotjar-707348.js

hotjar-707348.js

558 ms

pa-52b1fc3dabe53d7a38000000.js

pa-52b1fc3dabe53d7a38000000.js

651 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

791 ms

pixel.js

pixel.js

542 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

647 ms

js

js

133 ms

activityi;src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=1600718711805;gtm=2wgaa0;auiddc=1552895226.1666030732;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F

activityi;src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=1600718711805;gtm=2wgaa0;auiddc=1552895226.1666030732;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F

878 ms

midmarklogo_fullcolor_notaglinee4a75469e855406fb0547ba5537368f5.png

midmarklogo_fullcolor_notaglinee4a75469e855406fb0547ba5537368f5.png

408 ms

home-hero-1-mobile74f21d94a1e94a2f882150cb4689fd5a.jpg

home-hero-1-mobile74f21d94a1e94a2f882150cb4689fd5a.jpg

751 ms

homepage-bg.png

homepage-bg.png

1583 ms

midmark-logo-r-small-tagline.png

midmark-logo-r-small-tagline.png

406 ms

magnifying-glass.png

magnifying-glass.png

255 ms

Avenir-Book.woff

Avenir-Book.woff

428 ms

Nexa_Bold-webfont.woff

Nexa_Bold-webfont.woff

425 ms

Bo4A

Bo4A

69 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

738 ms

modules.db0fd5db80f832174879.js

modules.db0fd5db80f832174879.js

668 ms

398561344199985

398561344199985

106 ms

ai.0.js

ai.0.js

609 ms

src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=1600718711805;gtm=2wgaa0;auiddc=1552895226.1666030732;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F

src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=1600718711805;gtm=2wgaa0;auiddc=1552895226.1666030732;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F

582 ms

ns.html

ns.html

397 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

262 ms

ytc.js

ytc.js

207 ms

icon

icon

449 ms

activityi;src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=228595587;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F

activityi;src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=228595587;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F

115 ms

collect

collect

52 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

10099788.json

10099788.json

257 ms

src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=228595587;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F

src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=228595587;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F

259 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

527 ms

SEO Factors

ritter.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ritter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: