Access ritterkeller.de. Rittermahl, Ritteressen im historischen Ritterkeller mit Hotel

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,410 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.165

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

ritterkeller.de

247 ms

www.ritterkeller.de

1078 ms

widget

870 ms

gtm.js

455 ms

05_pl_vendor.min.js

387 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Ritterkeller.de, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritterkeller.de.

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Ritterkeller.de main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 364.2 kB

Original 460.6 kB
After minification 460.1 kB
After compression 96.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 364.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

Original 3.0 MB
After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritterkeller images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

Original 276.5 kB
After minification 276.5 kB
After compression 245.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 181 B

Original 32.2 kB
After minification 32.2 kB
After compression 32.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritterkeller.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritterkeller. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

DE
Language Claimed

DE
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritterkeller.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritterkeller.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ritterkeller.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritterkeller. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Rittermahl, Ritteressen im historischen Ritterkeller mit Hotel

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

ritterkeller.de

www.ritterkeller.de

widget

gtm.js

05_pl_vendor.min.js

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

ritterkeller.de

www.ritterkeller.de

widget

gtm.js

05_pl_vendor.min.js

5_pl_webfonts.js

10_jquery-ui.js

20_pl_utils.js

angular.min.js

dd82474708.js

SocialShare.js

BookingReservation.js

BookingDirs.js

NewsletterSubscribe.js

11_pl_arrival.js

datepicker.js

datepicker-de.js

15_jquery.waypoints.js

16_jquery.waypoints.inview.js

17_jquery.waypoints.sticky.js

18_jquery.venobox.js

19_jquery.pie.js

30_pl_menu.js

45_pl_scroll.js

45_pl_scroll.stick-header.js

08be37a5-4cb1-41c4-ba45-47a52e28c818

70_pl_calendar.js

70_pl_datepicker.js

80_pl_slider.js

81_pl_timeline-vertical.js

90_pl_flyout.js

100_pl_script.js

parsley.min.js

ndsmapGoogleApi.js

PowermailDate.js

csm__44B6622_224ad6df33.jpg

csm_Logo_HC-Award_2023_0b164050bd.jpg

csm_Logo_TA-Award_2020-5__002__b77881ba29.jpg

csm_2020_Booking_Award_67782c6cf2.png

csm_a-004-a-105-IR2_2982--_R_-IngoRack--_R_-IngoRack_9732535031.jpg

modernizr.custom.js

analytics.js

collect

csm_Logo_TA-Award_2020-5002b77881ba29.jpg