Access ritterwerk.de. Küchengeräte und Haushaltsgeräte „made in Germany“

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

ritterwerk.de

286 ms

ritterwerk.de

388 ms

www.ritterwerk.de

236 ms

www.ritterwerk.de

793 ms

font-awesome.min.css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ritterwerk.de, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritterwerk.de.

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Ritterwerk.de main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 62.2 kB

Original 84.9 kB
After minification 78.8 kB
After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 333.6 kB

Original 3.0 MB
After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ritter Werk needs image optimization as it can save up to 333.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 493.9 kB

Original 730.1 kB
After minification 687.6 kB
After compression 236.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 493.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 228.7 kB

Original 296.9 kB
After minification 247.7 kB
After compression 68.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritterwerk.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 228.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritter Werk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

DE
Language Claimed

DE
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritterwerk.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritterwerk.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ritterwerk.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritter Werk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Küchengeräte und Haushaltsgeräte „made in Germany“ - ritter

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

ritterwerk.de

ritterwerk.de

www.ritterwerk.de

www.ritterwerk.de

font-awesome.min.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

ritterwerk.de

ritterwerk.de

www.ritterwerk.de

www.ritterwerk.de

font-awesome.min.css

5b860df2-6e0c-4d4f-b2bf-f17c939e2996.css

bootstrap.css

js

layout.css

layout-tablet.css

layout-phone.css

typography.css

form.css

ritterwerk_all.js

jquery.socialshareprivacy_de.js

slider.js

prototype.js

behaviour.js

prototype_improvements.js

i18n.js

en_US.js

de_DE.js

Validator.js

addthis_widget.js

css3-mediaqueries.js

ga.js

__utm.gif

background2.png

header-bg.png

logo-sprite.png

claim.png

iconSprite.png

pfeil-klein.png

naviSprite.jpg

pfeil_navi_down.png

naviimage-allesschneider-premium.png

naviimage-allesschneider-comfort.png

naviimage-allesschneider-economy.png

naviimage-Kaffeemaschine.jpg

naviimage-Wasserkocher.jpg

naviimage-toaster.png

naviimage-sparschaeler.png

naviimage-Einbau-Allesschneider-1.png