Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

ritzenhoff.info

Niklas Ritzenhoff - Verkäufer VW Neuwagen PKW - bhg Autohandelsgesellschaft mbH | XING

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

292 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

560 ms

ritzenhoff.info screenshot

About Website

Visit ritzenhoff.info now to see the best up-to-date Ritzenhoff content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ritzenhoff.info

Niklas Ritzenhoff, Freiburg Im Breisgau Professional experience, contact details, portfolio, etc.: Find out more or get in touch with Niklas Ritzenhoff on XING.

Visit ritzenhoff.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Ritzenhoff.info page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ritzenhoff.info performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ritzenhoff.info

292 ms

Niklas_Ritzenhoff

1126 ms

main-7815e286449b.css

216 ms

6-2fb74792ed89.css

323 ms

polyfill.min.js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ritzenhoff.info, 69% (11 requests) were made to Xing.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Polyfill.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Profile-images.xing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.6 kB (30%)

Content Size

549.9 kB

After Optimization

385.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Ritzenhoff.info main page is 549.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 379.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 135.0 kB

  • Original 158.5 kB
  • After minification 158.4 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 379.1 kB
  • After minification 349.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritzenhoff images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 36 B

  • Original 12.2 kB
  • After minification 12.2 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritzenhoff.info has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritzenhoff. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

ritzenhoff.info accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

ritzenhoff.info best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ritzenhoff.info SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritzenhoff.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritzenhoff.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ritzenhoff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: