4.5 sec in total
647 ms
2.9 sec
973 ms
Welcome to rivacard.com homepage info - get ready to check Rivacard best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about rivacard.com
Visit rivacard.comWe analyzed Rivacard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 647 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rivacard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value1,540 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.066
97/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
647 ms
148 ms
289 ms
42 ms
406 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Rivacard.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Rivacard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 70.0 kB (5%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rivacard.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rivacard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rivacard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (19%)
27
22
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rivacard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
rivacard.com
647 ms
style.css
148 ms
social-likes_classic.css
289 ms
jquery.min.js
42 ms
jquery.hoverdir.js
406 ms
css
71 ms
bgj.jpg
621 ms
dpmenu.png
140 ms
allcity.png
137 ms
r1.png
297 ms
r2.png
296 ms
r3.png
297 ms
r4.png
295 ms
r5.png
297 ms
r6.png
429 ms
r7.png
429 ms
r8.png
432 ms
bgs.png
427 ms
logo.png
632 ms
about.jpg
1035 ms
kartah.jpg
1029 ms
kartah2.png
1707 ms
gala.png
615 ms
sk0.png
769 ms
sk1.png
763 ms
nline.jpg
1161 ms
bgfoo.jpg
1706 ms
soc.png
900 ms
watch.js
6 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTWeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf
45 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSmeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf
59 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzGeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf
92 ms
rivacard.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rivacard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rivacard.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rivacard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rivacard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rivacard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rivacard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: