Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

riveraesthetics.com

River Aesthetics | Cosmetic Skin Clinic | Body Treatments

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

riveraesthetics.com screenshot

About Website

Visit riveraesthetics.com now to see the best up-to-date River Aesthetics content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about riveraesthetics.com

River Aesthetics is a cosmetic clinic offering bespoke medical aesthetics, anti-ageing treatments, Botox, dermal fillers and many more. Call 01202024060.

Visit riveraesthetics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Riveraesthetics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riveraesthetics.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,720 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riveraesthetics.com

214 ms

riveraesthetics.com

430 ms

gtm.js

52 ms

autoptimize_72ed7036c86000af182144d4e36b5ddc.css

104 ms

style_dynamic_callback.php

303 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Riveraesthetics.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn.popt.in. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) belongs to the original domain Riveraesthetics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.1 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Riveraesthetics.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 729.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 179.9 kB

  • Original 221.9 kB
  • After minification 221.7 kB
  • After compression 42.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 941 B

  • Original 437.4 kB
  • After minification 436.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. River Aesthetics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 219 B

  • Original 729.3 kB
  • After minification 729.3 kB
  • After compression 729.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 421.2 kB
  • After minification 421.2 kB
  • After compression 421.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riveraesthetics.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of River Aesthetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

riveraesthetics.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

riveraesthetics.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

riveraesthetics.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riveraesthetics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riveraesthetics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of River Aesthetics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: