Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

riversan.ru

Элитная европейская сантехника | riversan.ru

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

791 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

797 ms

riversan.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Riversan content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riversan.ru

Элитная сантехника премиум-класса от ведущих европейских брендов с доставкой по всей России на сайте компании Риверсан

Visit riversan.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Riversan.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 791 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riversan.ru performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.503

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riversan.ru

791 ms

bootstrap.min.css

439 ms

ft_base.css

311 ms

stylesheet.css

309 ms

color_green.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Riversan.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Riversan.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Riversan.ru main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 107.1 kB

  • Original 126.8 kB
  • After minification 112.6 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riversan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 244.4 kB
  • After minification 244.4 kB
  • After compression 238.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 914 B

  • Original 41.2 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riversan.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (40%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riversan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

riversan.ru accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

riversan.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

riversan.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riversan.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riversan.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riversan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: