Tools & Wizards About Us
riveting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

riveting.com

Riveting Media ® Inc. | Web Design & Development Half Moon Bay Area

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

822 ms

riveting.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Riveting content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riveting.com

Riveting Media ® Inc. is a web design and development company in Half Moon Bay providing website design, SEO & Digital Marketing services.

Visit riveting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Riveting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riveting.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,770 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.052

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riveting.com

199 ms

www.riveting.com

1114 ms

style.min.css

104 ms

styles.css

153 ms

extendify-utilities.css

155 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Riveting.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Riveting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.2 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riveting.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 108.7 kB

  • Original 133.7 kB
  • After minification 129.1 kB
  • After compression 24.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 64.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riveting images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 524.6 kB
  • After minification 524.6 kB
  • After compression 522.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 109.5 kB
  • After minification 108.8 kB
  • After compression 105.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riveting.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (58%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riveting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

riveting.com

riveting.com

199 ms

www.riveting.com

www.riveting.com

1114 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

104 ms

styles.css

styles.css

153 ms

extendify-utilities.css

extendify-utilities.css

155 ms

style.css

style.css

154 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

159 ms

front-flex.min.css

front-flex.min.css

163 ms

style.css

style.css

158 ms

style.css

style.css

204 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

257 ms

style.css

style.css

205 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

207 ms

components.css

components.css

269 ms

page-builder.css

page-builder.css

163 ms

tiny-slider.css

tiny-slider.css

222 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

223 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

270 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

258 ms

revolution.tools.min.js

revolution.tools.min.js

320 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

372 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

316 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

284 ms

bootstrap-tabcollapse.js

bootstrap-tabcollapse.js

269 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

350 ms

inview.js

inview.js

349 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

350 ms

functions.js

functions.js

370 ms

orion-svg.js

orion-svg.js

388 ms

tiny-slider.js

tiny-slider.js

389 ms

tiny-slider.js

tiny-slider.js

388 ms

css

css

37 ms

css

css

58 ms

style.css

style.css

386 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

425 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

425 ms

index.js

index.js

426 ms

index.js

index.js

469 ms

jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js

jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js

466 ms

api.js

api.js

44 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

467 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

429 ms

html5-fallback.js

html5-fallback.js

385 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

381 ms

index.js

index.js

381 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

381 ms

2021-RM-Logo-6.png

2021-RM-Logo-6.png

90 ms

bay-area-web-design-homeslider-14.jpg

bay-area-web-design-homeslider-14.jpg

277 ms

rafael-soultanov-150x150.jpg

rafael-soultanov-150x150.jpg

162 ms

5-star-100.png

5-star-100.png

164 ms

Diana-Boiteux-3-150x150.jpg

Diana-Boiteux-3-150x150.jpg

163 ms

Brad_Hunsaker_2-150x150.jpg

Brad_Hunsaker_2-150x150.jpg

163 ms

Jesse-Meyer-2-150x150.jpg

Jesse-Meyer-2-150x150.jpg

180 ms

whitaker-504x500.jpg

whitaker-504x500.jpg

234 ms

rocn-and-roll-dental-504x500.jpg

rocn-and-roll-dental-504x500.jpg

234 ms

union-square-detnal-504x500.jpg

union-square-detnal-504x500.jpg

231 ms

serenity-504x500.jpg

serenity-504x500.jpg

234 ms

fresno-dentist-504x500.jpg

fresno-dentist-504x500.jpg

271 ms

apollonia-detnal-504x500.jpg

apollonia-detnal-504x500.jpg

288 ms

smile-central-valley-504x500.jpg

smile-central-valley-504x500.jpg

335 ms

lift-pargaliging-2-504x500.jpg

lift-pargaliging-2-504x500.jpg

286 ms

truist-dental-504x500.jpg

truist-dental-504x500.jpg

334 ms

AzimiLogo3-300x129.png

AzimiLogo3-300x129.png

319 ms

serenity-dental-logo.png

serenity-dental-logo.png

328 ms

Netzley-DDS-Logo.png

Netzley-DDS-Logo.png

339 ms

ExtrapordoinarySmile.png

ExtrapordoinarySmile.png

338 ms

palo-alto-dentstry-logo-7.png

palo-alto-dentstry-logo-7.png

372 ms

Ramaekers-Logo-2.jpg

Ramaekers-Logo-2.jpg

380 ms

los-angeles-dentist-logo4.jpg

los-angeles-dentist-logo4.jpg

386 ms

Apollonia-logo.png

Apollonia-logo.png

388 ms

SCV-logo.png

SCV-logo.png

370 ms

Lift-logo226x156-border.png

Lift-logo226x156-border.png

366 ms

half-moon-bay-area-web-design-2.jpg

half-moon-bay-area-web-design-2.jpg

399 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

60 ms

Orionicon.woff

Orionicon.woff

409 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

60 ms

widget.js

widget.js

185 ms

Half-Moon-Bay-Area-SEO.jpg

Half-Moon-Bay-Area-SEO.jpg

380 ms

half-moon-bay-area-ecommerce-websites.jpg

half-moon-bay-area-ecommerce-websites.jpg

379 ms

half-moon-bay-area-web-design-3.jpg

half-moon-bay-area-web-design-3.jpg

380 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

65 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

420 ms

widget_app_base_1726651421361.js

widget_app_base_1726651421361.js

17 ms

Accessibility Review

riveting.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

riveting.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

riveting.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riveting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riveting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

riveting.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riveting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: