Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rj-app.app

Radio Javan

Page Load Speed

481 ms in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

351 ms

Page Rendered

66 ms

rj-app.app screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rj App content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rj-app.app

Radio Javan provides you the best of Persian music. Listen and watch anything you like.

Visit rj-app.app

Key Findings

We analyzed Rj-app.app page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 417 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rj-app.app performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,920 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rj-app.app

64 ms

rj-app.app

85 ms

play.radiojavan.com

124 ms

44f731e6e0d80411.css

26 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rj-app.app, 86% (12 requests) were made to Play.radiojavan.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (124 ms) relates to the external source Play.radiojavan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.3 kB (2%)

Content Size

403.9 kB

After Optimization

397.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Rj-app.app main page is 403.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 373.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 8.6 kB
  • After minification 8.6 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 123 B

  • Original 373.1 kB
  • After minification 373.1 kB
  • After compression 373.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 22.2 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rj-app.app has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (82%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rj App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rj-app.app accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rj-app.app best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rj-app.app SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rj-app.app can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rj-app.app main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rj App. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: