Tools & Wizards About Us
rjg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rjg.com

Richard J. Greenstone, Attorneys & Counselors at Law - Copyright, Trademark, Trade Secret, Licensing, Business and Transactional Law for the Computer,...

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

333 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

221 ms

rjg.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rjg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rjg.com

Copyright, Trademark, Trade Secret, Licensing, Business and Transactional Law for the Computer, Entertainment & Publishing Industries

Visit rjg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rjg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rjg.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rjg.com

333 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

70 ms

styles.css

135 ms

style.css

133 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Rjg.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (482 ms) belongs to the original domain Rjg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 390.5 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

823.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rjg.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 24.1 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 365.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 705.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rjg needs image optimization as it can save up to 365.5 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 103.8 kB
  • After minification 103.8 kB
  • After compression 98.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 15.4 kB
  • After minification 15.0 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rjg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (50%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rjg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rjg.com

rjg.com

333 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

70 ms

styles.css

styles.css

135 ms

style.css

style.css

133 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

133 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

208 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

136 ms

counter.js

counter.js

113 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

198 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

198 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

205 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

265 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

266 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

262 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

270 ms

style.css

style.css

144 ms

css

css

22 ms

css

css

68 ms

logo21.png

logo21.png

135 ms

Zindagi-Zabriske-Point4-med_1300x682edit3.jpg

Zindagi-Zabriske-Point4-med_1300x682edit3.jpg

482 ms

features-background.png

features-background.png

115 ms

avvo-rating-10.png

avvo-rating-10.png

194 ms

martindale-hubbel-av-preeminent.png

martindale-hubbel-av-preeminent.png

137 ms

member-of-ca-state-bar2.png

member-of-ca-state-bar2.png

141 ms

richard-j-greenstone.jpg

richard-j-greenstone.jpg

200 ms

facebook1.png

facebook1.png

196 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

204 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

207 ms

map.png

map.png

453 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

79 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

80 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

80 ms

t.php

t.php

149 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

150 ms

Accessibility Review

rjg.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rjg.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rjg.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rjg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rjg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rjg.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rjg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: