Tools & Wizards About Us
rjp.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

rjp.co.uk

Chartered Certified Accountants in Surrey & London | RJP | Tax Advisors

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

rjp.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit rjp.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date RJP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rjp.co.uk

We offer the full range of professional accountancy & tax services to business owners & individuals throughout Surrey and London.

Visit rjp.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Rjp.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rjp.co.uk performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rjp.co.uk

172 ms

rjp.co.uk

401 ms

slick-theme.css

49 ms

slick.css

54 ms

all.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Rjp.co.uk, 11% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 8% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (771 ms) belongs to the original domain Rjp.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.6 kB (44%)

Content Size

413.6 kB

After Optimization

231.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rjp.co.uk main page is 413.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 197.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 177.4 kB

  • Original 197.9 kB
  • After minification 153.7 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 44.2 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177.4 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RJP needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 163.0 kB
  • After minification 163.0 kB
  • After compression 160.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 651 B

  • Original 45.8 kB
  • After minification 45.8 kB
  • After compression 45.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rjp.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (70%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RJP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rjp.co.uk

rjp.co.uk

172 ms

rjp.co.uk

rjp.co.uk

401 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

49 ms

slick.css

slick.css

54 ms

all.css

all.css

55 ms

styles.css

styles.css

81 ms

wpa.css

wpa.css

158 ms

slick.css

slick.css

51 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

537 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

233 ms

page.js

page.js

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

385 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

234 ms

addtoany.min.js

addtoany.min.js

235 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

280 ms

header.js

header.js

384 ms

jaz6pat.js

jaz6pat.js

48 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

308 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

310 ms

index.js

index.js

371 ms

index.js

index.js

385 ms

wpa.js

wpa.js

386 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

59 ms

gsap.min.js

gsap.min.js

54 ms

ScrollTrigger.min.js

ScrollTrigger.min.js

56 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

67 ms

vendor.min.js

vendor.min.js

771 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

456 ms

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

457 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

460 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

103 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

151 ms

MuseoSansRounded-500.woff

MuseoSansRounded-500.woff

119 ms

MuseoSansRounded-300.woff

MuseoSansRounded-300.woff

350 ms

MuseoSansRounded-700.woff

MuseoSansRounded-700.woff

118 ms

MuseoSansRounded-900.woff

MuseoSansRounded-900.woff

350 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

52 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

82 ms

DMSans-Light.woff

DMSans-Light.woff

83 ms

DMSans-Bold.woff

DMSans-Bold.woff

314 ms

Inter-Regular.woff

Inter-Regular.woff

421 ms

Inter-Medium.woff

Inter-Medium.woff

383 ms

Inter-SemiBold.woff

Inter-SemiBold.woff

384 ms

js

js

73 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

167 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

175 ms

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

175 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

117 ms

hero-background.png

hero-background.png

109 ms

Frame-3-1.svg

Frame-3-1.svg

112 ms

SMEs-laptop.svg

SMEs-laptop.svg

110 ms

financial-management.svg

financial-management.svg

148 ms

private-clients.svg

private-clients.svg

176 ms

early-stage-growth-mountain.svg

early-stage-growth-mountain.svg

179 ms

accelerating-and-scaling-rocket.svg

accelerating-and-scaling-rocket.svg

178 ms

i

i

66 ms

i

i

99 ms

i

i

100 ms

i

i

125 ms

i

i

393 ms

i

i

243 ms

Frame-4-1.svg

Frame-4-1.svg

77 ms

Accessibility Review

rjp.co.uk accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rjp.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rjp.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rjp.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rjp.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rjp.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RJP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: