Tools & Wizards About Us
rjpconsultinggroup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

rjpconsultinggroup.com

Construction Management | RJP Consulting Group | Exton

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

60 ms

rjpconsultinggroup.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rjpconsultinggroup.com now to see the best up-to-date RJP Consulting Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rjpconsultinggroup.com

We are a leading construction management and construction consulting firm. We serve the retail, financial food service, hospitality, convenience/fuel and renewables industries.

Visit rjpconsultinggroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rjpconsultinggroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rjpconsultinggroup.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rjpconsultinggroup.com

1175 ms

www.rjpcg.com

1850 ms

minified.js

40 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

69 ms

polyfill.min.js

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rjpconsultinggroup.com, 35% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com and 35% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Rjpcg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 397.2 kB (52%)

Content Size

767.0 kB

After Optimization

369.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rjpconsultinggroup.com main page is 767.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 497.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 393.6 kB

  • Original 497.8 kB
  • After minification 496.0 kB
  • After compression 104.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 393.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 9.4 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RJP Consulting Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 259.8 kB
  • After minification 259.8 kB
  • After compression 256.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (50%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RJP Consulting Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rjpconsultinggroup.com

rjpconsultinggroup.com

1175 ms

www.rjpcg.com

www.rjpcg.com

1850 ms

minified.js

minified.js

40 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

69 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

69 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

115 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

115 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

114 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

115 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

115 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

118 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

117 ms

Logo%20CLEAR.png

Logo%20CLEAR.png

213 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

55 ms

7a1060_81b335756e4b44b683f8e6f46b892e07~mv2.jpg

7a1060_81b335756e4b44b683f8e6f46b892e07~mv2.jpg

237 ms

Logo%20CLEAR.png

Logo%20CLEAR.png

196 ms

7a1060_bfdced7c86314386809d7fca5cde4542~mv2.jpeg

7a1060_bfdced7c86314386809d7fca5cde4542~mv2.jpeg

331 ms

Logo%20CLEAR.png

Logo%20CLEAR.png

240 ms

98 ms

93 ms

94 ms

94 ms

94 ms

93 ms

130 ms

129 ms

128 ms

130 ms

128 ms

126 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

28 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

9 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

rjpconsultinggroup.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

rjpconsultinggroup.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rjpconsultinggroup.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rjpconsultinggroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rjpconsultinggroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rjpconsultinggroup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RJP Consulting Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: