Tools & Wizards About Us
rjsinternetmarketing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

rjsinternetmarketing.com

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

420 ms

Resources Loaded

699 ms

Page Rendered

291 ms

rjsinternetmarketing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rjsinternetmarketing.com now to see the best up-to-date Rjsinternetmarketing content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rjsinternetmarketing.com

Visit rjsinternetmarketing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rjsinternetmarketing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 420 ms and then it took 990 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Rjsinternetmarketing.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

rjsinternetmarketing.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,450 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rjsinternetmarketing.com

420 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

20 ms

css2

76 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff

48 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rjsinternetmarketing.com, 57% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (420 ms) belongs to the original domain Rjsinternetmarketing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 282 B (39%)

Content Size

717 B

After Optimization

435 B

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Rjsinternetmarketing.com main page is 717 B. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 717 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 282 B

  • Original 717 B
  • After minification 717 B
  • After compression 435 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 282 B or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • CSS

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rjsinternetmarketing. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

rjsinternetmarketing.com

rjsinternetmarketing.com

420 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

20 ms

css2

css2

76 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff

48 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

58 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZs.woff

82 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff

91 ms

Accessibility Review

rjsinternetmarketing.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rjsinternetmarketing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rjsinternetmarketing.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rjsinternetmarketing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rjsinternetmarketing.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rjsinternetmarketing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rjsinternetmarketing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: