2.3 sec in total
214 ms
2 sec
68 ms
Visit rlprinting.net now to see the best up-to-date Rl Printing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rlprinting.net
Print Shop Near Me. R & L Printing Services Inc is the best printing shop in Miami, FL. If You Need High-Quality Printing for Your Project. Visit Our Shop Today
Visit rlprinting.netWe analyzed Rlprinting.net page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rlprinting.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value5,360 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value26.7 s
0/100
10%
214 ms
32 ms
31 ms
886 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rlprinting.net, 40% (27 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 36% (24 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (886 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (71%)
2.5 MB
722.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rlprinting.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.6 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rl Printing needs image optimization as it can save up to 110.6 kB or 55% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 104.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (25%)
40
30
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rl Printing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rlprinting.net
214 ms
minified.js
32 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
31 ms
polyfill.min.js
886 ms
thunderbolt-commons.81e79c4a.bundle.min.js
5 ms
main.e8bb44c8.bundle.min.js
8 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
9 ms
lodash.min.js
14 ms
react.production.min.js
11 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
12 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
12 ms
e10403_1b6aa42df9f949b3995978d216f52820~mv2.png
175 ms
e10403_f1f99502a3a44c8c8a37ca0cdc72ee2c~mv2_d_4500_1800_s_2.png
294 ms
e10403_ac44da20de5b46d5ac92e67ac3105fb7~mv2.jpg
418 ms
e10403_b98f6e22c8884c4e8a65a742341ee8af~mv2.png
488 ms
HandheldCutOuts.jpg
485 ms
it228_ftdeco_51_p.jpg
486 ms
DominoSamples.png
491 ms
10x10%20Tent%20Kit.jpg
305 ms
FanMockup3.jpg
453 ms
BigHeadSocks.png
577 ms
DominoSamples.png
565 ms
large-sign-1.jpg
489 ms
large-postcard-2.jpg
601 ms
e10403_5a67a2f287684b41a9c215afadb41976~mv2_d_5500_4000_s_4_2.jpg
492 ms
PR_BusinessCards-02.jpg
773 ms
banner%2Bstands.jpg
711 ms
large-outdoor-banner-2.jpg
713 ms
d0db4b7d974a6dc8eb8bc0b64969017bx.jpg
566 ms
google-reviews-logo-white.png
755 ms
telegram.png
579 ms
Whatsapp.png
581 ms
SFCC-VECTOR-LOGO-dec-2011-(Small).png
583 ms
LaSalle.png
585 ms
Columbus.png
793 ms
ironpatern.84ec58ff.png
163 ms
4381b252-d9f8-4201-bbf3-9440e21259e7.woff
130 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
130 ms
05b176f5-c622-4c35-af98-c0c056dd5b66.woff
164 ms
80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff
129 ms
LuloCleanW05-OneBold.woff
163 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
162 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
165 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
163 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
163 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
163 ms
cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff
164 ms
bundle.min.js
178 ms
100 ms
93 ms
96 ms
92 ms
92 ms
89 ms
139 ms
136 ms
130 ms
128 ms
131 ms
131 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
23 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
19 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
4 ms
rlprinting.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rlprinting.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rlprinting.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rlprinting.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rlprinting.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rlprinting.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rl Printing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: