4.2 sec in total
882 ms
2.4 sec
881 ms
Visit rlt.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Rlt content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rlt.co.in
This domain may be for sale!
Visit rlt.co.inWe analyzed Rlt.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 882 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rlt.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value3.2 s
74/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.22
57/100
15%
Value3.2 s
95/100
10%
882 ms
100 ms
139 ms
142 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rlt.co.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (882 ms) belongs to the original domain Rlt.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 267.8 kB (19%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rlt.co.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rlt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 195.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 195.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rlt.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (29%)
66
47
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rlt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rlt.co.in
882 ms
reset.css
100 ms
main.css
139 ms
prettyPhoto.css
142 ms
jquery14.min.js
219 ms
jquery.tooltip.min.js
153 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
146 ms
preloader.js
169 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
206 ms
cufon.js
207 ms
Myriad_Pro_900.font.js
282 ms
global.js
246 ms
background.jpg
151 ms
bar.png
142 ms
divider.png
140 ms
bottom.png
144 ms
background.png
639 ms
contact1.png
139 ms
loading.gif
147 ms
01.jpg
347 ms
02.jpg
407 ms
03.jpg
337 ms
04.jpg
337 ms
05.jpg
407 ms
banner.png
414 ms
divider_horz.png
417 ms
imagewsd.png
414 ms
imagewsd2.png
468 ms
category_bottom.png
473 ms
category_top.png
477 ms
sidebar_middle.png
473 ms
divider.png
473 ms
divider.png
528 ms
divider.png
423 ms
contact2.png
72 ms
button_middle27.png
94 ms
dropdown.png
71 ms
dropdown_mouseover.png
90 ms
goleft.png
93 ms
goleft2.png
77 ms
goright.png
122 ms
goright2.png
123 ms
divider_vert.png
146 ms
badge.png
143 ms
sidebar.png
214 ms
category_top.png
149 ms
category_arrow.png
193 ms
readmore_main1.png
182 ms
readmore_main2.png
200 ms
button_basic.png
201 ms
button_long.png
200 ms
divder.png
251 ms
filedUnder.png
250 ms
input.png
264 ms
textarea.png
267 ms
submit_1.png
265 ms
submit_2.png
265 ms
tooltip.png
327 ms
newsletter.png
319 ms
submit_1.png
336 ms
submit_2.png
336 ms
left.png
326 ms
left2.png
325 ms
right.png
371 ms
right2.png
383 ms
twitter.png
392 ms
search.png
391 ms
search_1.png
393 ms
search_2.png
392 ms
polaroid.png
433 ms
rlt.co.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rlt.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Uses deprecated APIs
rlt.co.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rlt.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rlt.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rlt.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rlt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: