Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

rltt.net

روافد ليبيا – for Telecommunications and Technology

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

2.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

439 ms

rltt.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rltt.net now to see the best up-to-date Rltt content for Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rltt.net

Visit rltt.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rltt.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rltt.net performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,740 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.074

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rltt.net

2145 ms

style.css

91 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

156 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

116 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rltt.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rltt.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 160.9 kB (19%)

Content Size

849.0 kB

After Optimization

688.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Rltt.net main page is 849.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 663.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 12.2 kB
  • After minification 11.0 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 663.5 kB
  • After minification 635.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rltt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 74.5 kB

  • Original 112.5 kB
  • After minification 112.3 kB
  • After compression 38.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.5 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 49.8 kB

  • Original 60.8 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rltt.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rltt. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rltt.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rltt.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rltt.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    AR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rltt.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rltt.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rltt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: