Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 68

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

rlvintage.com

Home | Ralph Lauren

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

rlvintage.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rlvintage.com homepage info - get ready to check Rlvintage best content right away, or after learning these important things about rlvintage.com

Welcome to the world of Ralph Lauren. Discover timeless and authentic designer clothing for men, women, children and babies.

Visit rlvintage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rlvintage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rlvintage.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,790 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.879

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value146.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.jsp

172 ms

XRBW4-9839A-XTCDX-M283K-EZ7QE

40 ms

satelliteLib-14e575c29f161d8f7044cad19e3e6bc5b589d9ce.js

130 ms

flashobject.js

40 ms

swfobject.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 181 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rlvintage.com, 8% (14 requests) were made to D36i2kont0saxx.cloudfront.net and 6% (10 requests) were made to Assets.ralphlauren.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (562 ms) relates to the external source Ralphlauren.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (28%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Rlvintage.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 157.4 kB

  • Original 184.6 kB
  • After minification 168.5 kB
  • After compression 27.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 160.1 kB

  • Original 4.3 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rlvintage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 395.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 214.7 kB

  • Original 268.9 kB
  • After minification 229.1 kB
  • After compression 54.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rlvintage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 214.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 114 (67%)

Requests Now

170

After Optimization

56

The browser has sent 170 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rlvintage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rlvintage.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

rlvintage.com SEO score

68

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rlvintage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rlvintage.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rlvintage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: