Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

rm-pack.com

Kartons, und Verpackungsmaterial im Onlineshop bestellen

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

638 ms

rm-pack.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rm Pack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rm-pack.com

Günstige Kartons, Luftpolstertaschen, Colompac Verpackungen, Maxibriefe und Schlauchfolie können Sie bei direkt im Onlinehop bestellen und günstig kaufen

Visit rm-pack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rm-pack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rm-pack.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.353

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rm-pack.de

1332 ms

theme-28e5dd94.css

279 ms

trackingClient.bundle.js

197 ms

tracking.js

561 ms

bottom-2de75093.js

220 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rm-pack.com, 23% (6 requests) were made to Rm-pack.de and 4% (1 request) were made to Tracking24.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Rm-pack.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 179.6 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Rm-pack.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 748.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 157.2 kB

  • Original 179.9 kB
  • After minification 124.8 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 55.0 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 748.5 kB
  • After minification 740.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rm Pack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 196.8 kB
  • After minification 196.8 kB
  • After compression 187.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 79.9 kB
  • After minification 79.9 kB
  • After compression 74.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rm-pack.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (14%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rm Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rm-pack.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rm-pack.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rm-pack.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rm-pack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rm-pack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rm Pack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: