2.1 sec in total
160 ms
1.8 sec
190 ms
Click here to check amazing RMC Eg content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rmc-eg.com
seo description
Visit rmc-eg.comWe analyzed Rmc-eg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 160 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rmc-eg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value4.3 s
43/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value1.145
1/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
160 ms
295 ms
188 ms
219 ms
301 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Rmc-eg.com, 25% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (846 ms) belongs to the original domain Rmc-eg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 86.8 kB (18%)
487.2 kB
400.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Rmc-eg.com main page is 487.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 287.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RMC Eg needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmc-eg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (40%)
50
30
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RMC Eg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rmc-eg.com
160 ms
rmc-eg.com
295 ms
Default.aspx
188 ms
bootstrap.css
219 ms
settings.css
301 ms
prettify.css
299 ms
style.css
353 ms
green.css
311 ms
css
16 ms
css
29 ms
css
32 ms
fontello.css
347 ms
logo.png
317 ms
jquery.js
542 ms
bootstrap.min.js
403 ms
twitter-bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
407 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
507 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
558 ms
jquery.themepunch.showbizpro.min.js
512 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
480 ms
jquery.hoverdir.min.js
479 ms
jquery.slickforms.js
584 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
583 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
585 ms
view.min.js
604 ms
scripts.js
634 ms
853716_img1270x202.jpg
656 ms
604497_crm_programs270x202.jpg
657 ms
796749_img3270x202.jpg
656 ms
536889_media_planning_buying270x202.jpg
670 ms
489685_img5270x202.jpg
690 ms
925717_content_marketing270x202.jpg
712 ms
849292_img7270x202.jpg
734 ms
431983_img8270x202.jpg
747 ms
534451_motocycle270x202.jpg
757 ms
537040_img10270x202.jpg
744 ms
175652_img11270x202.jpg
772 ms
400525_brand_building270x202.jpg
826 ms
722574_img2270x202.jpg
839 ms
394159_img13270x202.jpg
843 ms
437009_creative_development270x202.jpg
827 ms
832261_img2270x202.jpg
846 ms
944713_img4270x202.jpg
625 ms
60634_car270x202.jpg
629 ms
374227_atl_btl_production270x202.jpg
709 ms
249814_img15270x202.jpg
649 ms
269677_img16270x202.jpg
648 ms
355870_communication_strategies270x202.jpg
616 ms
746722_img17270x202.jpg
608 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
8 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
10 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
19 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
18 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
18 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
18 ms
fontello.woff
700 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
18 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
19 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf
20 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf
19 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
23 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
23 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
39 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
23 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
23 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
38 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
40 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
39 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
39 ms
fontello-social.woff
652 ms
963684_event_management_supervision270x202.jpg
592 ms
logo_into.png
582 ms
header-bg1.jpg
590 ms
footer-bg1.jpg
595 ms
glyphicons-halflings.png
577 ms
rmc-eg.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
rmc-eg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rmc-eg.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmc-eg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmc-eg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rmc-eg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RMC Eg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: