914 ms in total
75 ms
430 ms
409 ms
Welcome to rmccoating.com homepage info - get ready to check Rmc Coating best content right away, or after learning these important things about rmccoating.com
If you’re looking for a professional finish for a variety of metal objects, always turn to Rocky Mountain Custom Coating in Hamilton.
Visit rmccoating.comWe analyzed Rmccoating.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 839 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
rmccoating.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.328
35/100
15%
Value5.4 s
71/100
10%
75 ms
53 ms
34 ms
39 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rmccoating.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (178 ms) belongs to the original domain Rmccoating.com.
Page size can be reduced by 153.3 kB (14%)
1.1 MB
958.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rmccoating.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 720.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rmc Coating images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 101.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.8 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmccoating.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)
36
9
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmc Coating. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rmccoating.com
75 ms
rmccoating.com
53 ms
style.min.css
34 ms
2-layout.css
39 ms
all.min.css
47 ms
animate.css
68 ms
7ed55f20b6dad260629ab5b0769645b0-layout-bundle.css
56 ms
style.min.css
64 ms
latest.css
53 ms
GD-cORe-public.css
62 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.css
99 ms
bootstrap-4.min.css
75 ms
skin-639c15b2953f3.css
83 ms
animate.min.css
81 ms
css
48 ms
jquery.min.js
105 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
88 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
94 ms
GD-cORe-public.js
95 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
123 ms
email-decode.min.js
95 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
171 ms
2-layout.js
139 ms
coblocks-animation.js
117 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
140 ms
c15bd7651f43fe76f3dc12d678b27035-layout-bundle.js
178 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.js
176 ms
bootstrap-4.min.js
176 ms
theme.min.js
169 ms
tti.min.js
14 ms
aadc63d8e8dbd533470bdc4e350bc4af
118 ms
DSC00325.jpg
115 ms
CEA_1321-1-scaled.jpg
115 ms
DSC00547.jpg
116 ms
fmf25111-scaled.jpg
117 ms
Banner--scaled.jpg
114 ms
scc-c2.min.js
64 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
63 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
69 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
86 ms
PN_zRfy9qWD8fEagAPg9pT8.woff
86 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
62 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
61 ms
logo.png
29 ms
rmccoating.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rmccoating.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rmccoating.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmccoating.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmccoating.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rmccoating.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rmc Coating. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: