3.1 sec in total
598 ms
2.4 sec
122 ms
Visit rmfl.ru now to see the best up-to-date Rmfl content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rmfl.ru
- -. .
Visit rmfl.ruWe analyzed Rmfl.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 598 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rmfl.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
598 ms
803 ms
165 ms
330 ms
664 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Rmfl.ru, 5% (1 request) were made to Informer.yandex.ru and 5% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (803 ms) belongs to the original domain Rmfl.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 16.8 kB (67%)
25.1 kB
8.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rmfl.ru main page is 25.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 20.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 287 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rmfl needs image optimization as it can save up to 287 B or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 174 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174 B or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmfl.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)
17
7
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmfl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
rmfl.ru
598 ms
www.rmfl.ru
803 ms
glmf8.css
165 ms
sh3.js
330 ms
3_0_FFFFFFFF_F7F3EFFF_0_pageviews
664 ms
zbck.gif
165 ms
h17.gif
183 ms
znlogo.gif
328 ms
zxc3.gif
350 ms
zxc4.gif
492 ms
zp.gif
493 ms
zxc9i.gif
507 ms
zxc7.gif
512 ms
zx0.gif
512 ms
zxc8.gif
516 ms
zblogo.gif
655 ms
pa.gif
656 ms
nologo_t.gif
675 ms
amfr_t.gif
681 ms
watch.js
0 ms
rmfl.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
rmfl.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
rmfl.ru SEO score
N/A
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmfl.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rmfl.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rmfl.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rmfl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: