Tools & Wizards About Us
rmgselection.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

rmgselection.com

RMG Executive - RMG Executive

Page Load Speed

10.4 sec in total

First Response

697 ms

Resources Loaded

9 sec

Page Rendered

680 ms

rmgselection.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rmgselection.com now to see the best up-to-date RMG Selection content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rmgselection.com

RMG is a leading international China based Recruitment firm - with over 10 years experience we can help you find a great job or hire outstanding candidates!

Visit rmgselection.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rmgselection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 697 ms and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rmgselection.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.775

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rmgselection.com

697 ms

jquery.js

1022 ms

style.css

22 ms

dashicons.min.css

31 ms

desktop_style.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Rmgselection.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Platform.linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rmgselection.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (43%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rmgselection.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 67.4 kB

  • Original 83.5 kB
  • After minification 75.6 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 64.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RMG Selection images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 461.9 kB

  • Original 671.5 kB
  • After minification 602.9 kB
  • After compression 209.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 461.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 520.1 kB

  • Original 636.8 kB
  • After minification 572.6 kB
  • After compression 116.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmgselection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 520.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (77%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RMG Selection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rmgselection.com

www.rmgselection.com

697 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1022 ms

style.css

style.css

22 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

31 ms

desktop_style.css

desktop_style.css

24 ms

rokbox.css

rokbox.css

18 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

30 ms

mosaic.css

mosaic.css

27 ms

menu-aa28971424fd66cde1f87386410374f1.css

menu-aa28971424fd66cde1f87386410374f1.css

33 ms

grid-responsive.css

grid-responsive.css

35 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

36 ms

master-7f192821dc2f728b60f40333ef780375.css

master-7f192821dc2f728b60f40333ef780375.css

45 ms

section-7f192821dc2f728b60f40333ef780375.css

section-7f192821dc2f728b60f40333ef780375.css

41 ms

mediaqueries.css

mediaqueries.css

48 ms

style.css

style.css

43 ms

rokajaxsearch.css

rokajaxsearch.css

50 ms

rokajaxsearch-theme.css

rokajaxsearch-theme.css

54 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

1386 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

910 ms

front_end_script.js

front_end_script.js

502 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

1078 ms

mootools-mobile.js

mootools-mobile.js

658 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

957 ms

roksprocket.js

roksprocket.js

1120 ms

moofx.js

moofx.js

1361 ms

roksprocket.request.js

roksprocket.request.js

1439 ms

mosaic.js

mosaic.js

3045 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

2505 ms

signals.js

signals.js

1586 ms

hasher.js

hasher.js

3597 ms

spin.js

spin.js

3623 ms

wpjb.js

wpjb.js

3464 ms

gantry-totop.js

gantry-totop.js

4579 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

2844 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

4606 ms

in.js

in.js

9 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

3044 ms

rokajaxsearch.js

rokajaxsearch.js

4767 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

4686 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

6567 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

4859 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

4011 ms

ga.js

ga.js

33 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

29 ms

squares.png

squares.png

23 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

79 ms

logo.png

logo.png

21 ms

icon-key.png

icon-key.png

22 ms

icon-info.png

icon-info.png

77 ms

444.jpg

444.jpg

78 ms

page-1.jpg

page-1.jpg

78 ms

map.png

map.png

83 ms

3949d7c3fe70d46e113b4b1bc048f538_504_367.jpg

3949d7c3fe70d46e113b4b1bc048f538_504_367.jpg

80 ms

e24aa3aa8b51728f2e5dddf8da524b4c_504_367.jpg

e24aa3aa8b51728f2e5dddf8da524b4c_504_367.jpg

1365 ms

eed91c95e7cb79919923b135dd73e3f2_504_367.jpg

eed91c95e7cb79919923b135dd73e3f2_504_367.jpg

89 ms

search-icon.png

search-icon.png

728 ms

secureAnonymousFramework

secureAnonymousFramework

50 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

19 ms

img3.jpg

img3.jpg

97 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

56 ms

eau_sans_bold-webfont.woff

eau_sans_bold-webfont.woff

57 ms

eau_sans_book-webfont.woff

eau_sans_book-webfont.woff

58 ms

dark.png

dark.png

78 ms

share

share

65 ms

sprite_connect_v14.png

sprite_connect_v14.png

49 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

rmgselection.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rmgselection.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rmgselection.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmgselection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmgselection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rmgselection.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RMG Selection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: