Tools & Wizards About Us
rms.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rms.de

Radiowerbung schnell und unkompliziert buchen mit RMS

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

399 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

813 ms

rms.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rms.de homepage info - get ready to check RMS best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about rms.de

Buchen Sie schnell und unkompliziert Radiowerbung, die bei Ihrer Zielgruppe ankommt. RMS unterstützt Sie bei Ihrer Audiokampagne.

Visit rms.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Rms.de page load time and found that the first response time was 399 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rms.de performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rms.de

399 ms

rms.de

716 ms

iframeResizer.min.js

30 ms

loader.js

24 ms

46b31c487f92d2cfa6c5.js

248 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Rms.de, 11% (4 requests) were made to App.usercentrics.eu and 8% (3 requests) were made to Api.usercentrics.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (904 ms) belongs to the original domain Rms.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 248.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

929.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rms.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 529.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 246.7 kB

  • Original 297.7 kB
  • After minification 292.9 kB
  • After compression 51.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 246.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 529.8 kB
  • After minification 528.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RMS images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 15 B

  • Original 350.5 kB
  • After minification 350.5 kB
  • After compression 350.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (35%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RMS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rms.de

rms.de

399 ms

rms.de

rms.de

716 ms

iframeResizer.min.js

iframeResizer.min.js

30 ms

loader.js

loader.js

24 ms

46b31c487f92d2cfa6c5.js

46b31c487f92d2cfa6c5.js

248 ms

40e6c406726d83264f54.js

40e6c406726d83264f54.js

319 ms

b604c23b91c9d1076c3a.js

b604c23b91c9d1076c3a.js

556 ms

1ec0dc48a7585607b946.js

1ec0dc48a7585607b946.js

874 ms

1814c26d00aa32ffef6a.js

1814c26d00aa32ffef6a.js

671 ms

9f8

9f8

413 ms

a855ea0.svg

a855ea0.svg

421 ms

cbc99c2.svg

cbc99c2.svg

424 ms

thumbnail

thumbnail

620 ms

thumbnail

thumbnail

741 ms

thumbnail

thumbnail

844 ms

thumbnail

thumbnail

881 ms

thumbnail

thumbnail

879 ms

c39378f.png

c39378f.png

726 ms

bundle_legacy.js

bundle_legacy.js

13 ms

bf589b1.woff

bf589b1.woff

834 ms

0f5f9fc.woff

0f5f9fc.woff

870 ms

fae97af.woff

fae97af.woff

904 ms

1e3b3bd.ttf

1e3b3bd.ttf

692 ms

45388fe.ttf

45388fe.ttf

699 ms

ec681aa.ttf

ec681aa.ttf

719 ms

languages.json

languages.json

136 ms

piUtils.js

piUtils.js

20 ms

ramses__teaser__sublink.png

ramses__teaser__sublink.png

491 ms

en.json

en.json

133 ms

cross-domain-bridge.html

cross-domain-bridge.html

8 ms

1px.png

1px.png

14 ms

ramses__teaser__sublink.png

ramses__teaser__sublink.png

258 ms

translations-en.json

translations-en.json

10 ms

pd.js

pd.js

31 ms

uct

uct

833 ms

Logo_RMS_Cookie_Banner.png

Logo_RMS_Cookie_Banner.png

551 ms

Accessibility Review

rms.de accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rms.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rms.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rms.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rms.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rms.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RMS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: