5.7 sec in total
800 ms
4.7 sec
197 ms
Click here to check amazing RMS content for Portugal. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rms.pt
Radiocomunicações profissionais e amadoras. Navegação GPS para profissionais, estrada, off-road
Visit rms.ptWe analyzed Rms.pt page load time and found that the first response time was 800 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rms.pt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value6.3 s
41/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.163
72/100
15%
Value4.8 s
78/100
10%
800 ms
1847 ms
336 ms
480 ms
263 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Rms.pt, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rms.pt.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (70%)
2.4 MB
714.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Rms.pt main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 74.5 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.7 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 330.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RMS needs image optimization as it can save up to 330.2 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 915.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 915.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 238.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rms.pt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 238.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (42%)
92
53
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RMS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rms.pt
800 ms
1847 ms
font-awesome.min.css
336 ms
bootstrap.css
480 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
263 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.css
249 ms
bootstrap-select.css
246 ms
jquery-ui.css
321 ms
uniform.default.css
368 ms
banner.css
376 ms
menu-esq.css
365 ms
tabs.css
430 ms
noticias.css
435 ms
artigos.css
485 ms
skin.css
487 ms
geral.css
486 ms
estilos.css
546 ms
paginas.css
547 ms
login.css
582 ms
prettyPhoto.css
589 ms
owl.carousel.css
579 ms
owl.theme.css
587 ms
jquery.selectbox.css
648 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
877 ms
jquery-ui.js
1165 ms
dotdotdot.js
698 ms
jquery.uniform.js
738 ms
bootstrap.js
824 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
770 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
813 ms
bootstrap-select.js
856 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
896 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
918 ms
jquery.autobox.js
935 ms
validacoes.js
967 ms
geral.js
993 ms
ifmb.js
996 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
833 ms
PT.js
823 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
855 ms
owl.carousel.js
848 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.2.js
791 ms
logo.png
221 ms
j1s7gk043.jpg
178 ms
5r875rc43.jpg
180 ms
08943z043.jpg
178 ms
5q15hx043.jpg
180 ms
0c11n0743.jpg
178 ms
23323ma43.jpg
221 ms
77k866843.jpg
224 ms
mu44yjg43.jpg
235 ms
6065v7543.jpg
235 ms
m07114z43.jpg
237 ms
btnPesquisa2.png
309 ms
87k4abw17.png
288 ms
e4yx7e017.png
292 ms
9w850c818.png
303 ms
k1j757118.png
309 ms
rtao1b119.png
307 ms
73154xs19.png
376 ms
t63o5c021.png
393 ms
navPrev.jpg
404 ms
navNext.jpg
409 ms
iconMore.png
421 ms
VDl4BSnK.jpg
414 ms
03oyr373617.jpg
479 ms
2u3uxrx3615.jpg
497 ms
j90da963614.jpg
507 ms
hf7yu5s3612.jpg
512 ms
066zb093611.jpg
518 ms
3xypvn43610.jpg
525 ms
3t3qxx73609.jpg
582 ms
b6w78513608.jpg
599 ms
0m010i93607.jpg
610 ms
81e1zon3606.jpg
613 ms
r0ira0y3605.jpg
620 ms
9ye077s3604.jpg
634 ms
41228993600.jpg
692 ms
ga.js
96 ms
7667af53595.png
578 ms
qd0w0233594.jpg
588 ms
1dxuvu23579.jpg
600 ms
231xk7z3578.jpg
600 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
4q40o333574.jpg
596 ms
6y554fc3572.jpg
652 ms
u51q5f7.jpg
643 ms
rmsPagamentos.png
777 ms
iconFace.jpg
646 ms
iconYoutube.jpg
647 ms
b_azul.png
674 ms
grabbing.png
648 ms
navPrevHover.jpg
634 ms
navNextHover.jpg
657 ms
rms.pt accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
rms.pt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rms.pt SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PT
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rms.pt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rms.pt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rms.pt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RMS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: