9.3 sec in total
2.7 sec
6.3 sec
352 ms
Visit rmslusitania.info now to see the best up-to-date Rms Lusitania content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rmslusitania.info
An international collaborative project dedicated to the RMS Lusitania, the Lusitania disaster, and passengers and crew aboard the ship's final voyage.
Visit rmslusitania.infoWe analyzed Rmslusitania.info page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rmslusitania.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value7,910 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.195
63/100
15%
Value22.5 s
1/100
10%
2682 ms
107 ms
125 ms
124 ms
125 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rmslusitania.info, 8% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Rmslusitania.info.
Page size can be reduced by 540.9 kB (59%)
922.9 kB
381.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Rmslusitania.info main page is 922.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 442.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 151.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rms Lusitania images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 72.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 72.9 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 313.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmslusitania.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 313.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (68%)
113
36
The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rms Lusitania. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rmslusitania.info
2682 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
107 ms
q-a-plus.css
125 ms
tfg_style.css
124 ms
bbpress.css
125 ms
dashicons.min.css
188 ms
reset.css
127 ms
my-calendar.css
168 ms
style.css
184 ms
2c-l-fixed.css
185 ms
blue.css
187 ms
user.css
188 ms
jetpack.css
229 ms
addtoany.min.css
246 ms
jquery.js
368 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
248 ms
superfish.js
247 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
248 ms
svg-inline-min.js
290 ms
pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
6 ms
pinit.js
6 ms
hostedbadge.php
142 ms
counter.js
41 ms
42bd21eb1898bb317d1768efe59a2c2d
57 ms
show_ads.js
8 ms
IMG_1182-1024x767.jpg
910 ms
lusypostcard.jpg
366 ms
award_dova.gif
304 ms
golda.jpg
307 ms
q-a-plus.js
314 ms
widgets.js
84 ms
plusone.js
55 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
333 ms
comment-reply.min.js
335 ms
editor.js
376 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
391 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
393 ms
wp-embed.min.js
394 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
397 ms
mc-grid.js
437 ms
mc-list.js
452 ms
mc-mini.js
455 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
default.css
314 ms
base.css
64 ms
back.png
601 ms
searchsubmit.gif
88 ms
rss.png
88 ms
facebook.png
88 ms
gplus.png
88 ms
twitter.png
301 ms
widgets.js
8 ms
288 ms
pinit_main.js
62 ms
page.js
244 ms
form.jpg
286 ms
feed-title-white.jpg
286 ms
ca-pub-5877731169126246.js
238 ms
zrt_lookup.html
284 ms
show_ads_impl.js
312 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
338 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
368 ms
fastbutton
451 ms
like.php
478 ms
count.json
429 ms
count.json
429 ms
all.js
379 ms
hovercard.css
78 ms
services.css
215 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
305 ms
dropdown.png
145 ms
shadow.png
77 ms
g.gif
125 ms
sm13.html
217 ms
badge_su.js
221 ms
badges_su.css
259 ms
icons.15.svg.css
261 ms
ads
237 ms
osd.js
94 ms
ads
253 ms
postmessageRelay
114 ms
ads
230 ms
89 ms
xd_arbiter.php
182 ms
xd_arbiter.php
362 ms
ga.js
139 ms
rs=AGLTcCPp65oTnX7XI_ISus95mcUHkH7hXw
6 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
35 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
35 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
100 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
388 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
421 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
133 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
61 ms
badgeRect74x18.png
118 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
53 ms
m_js_controller.js
105 ms
abg.js
124 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
114 ms
16204936937718534328
107 ms
16492755349931135507
107 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
favicon
116 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
38 ms
s
29 ms
x_button_blue2.png
9 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
8 ms
ui
24 ms
jot.html
31 ms
xd_arbiter.php
154 ms
login_button.php
53 ms
hUSYDpLL5L-.js
167 ms
gbMf6eR-Toa.png
128 ms
_h4YabwN-yR.gif
123 ms
rmslusitania.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
rmslusitania.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rmslusitania.info SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmslusitania.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmslusitania.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rmslusitania.info
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rms Lusitania. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: