Tools & Wizards About Us
rnsolar.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rnsolar.in

RN SOLAR INDUSTRY| RN solar | Solar Mounting Structures

Page Load Speed

25.6 sec in total

First Response

503 ms

Resources Loaded

25 sec

Page Rendered

123 ms

rnsolar.in screenshot

About Website

Visit rnsolar.in now to see the best up-to-date RN SOLAR content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rnsolar.in

RN Solar Industry(solar division), rn engineering, rnsolar, solar mounting structure manufacture india, solar mounting system, renewable energy,Rooftop solar system india,solar structure tamilnadu

Visit rnsolar.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rnsolar.in page load time and found that the first response time was 503 ms and then it took 25.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

rnsolar.in performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rnsolar.in

503 ms

www.rnsolar.in

2329 ms

style.css

326 ms

red.css

649 ms

wide.css

731 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rnsolar.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rnsolar.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 140.3 kB (26%)

Content Size

547.8 kB

After Optimization

407.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rnsolar.in main page is 547.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 433.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 13.8 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 127.4 kB

  • Original 433.5 kB
  • After minification 306.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RN SOLAR needs image optimization as it can save up to 127.4 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 74.9 kB
  • After minification 74.9 kB
  • After compression 73.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 546 B

  • Original 24.9 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rnsolar.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (83%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RN SOLAR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rnsolar.in

rnsolar.in

503 ms

www.rnsolar.in

www.rnsolar.in

2329 ms

style.css

style.css

326 ms

red.css

red.css

649 ms

wide.css

wide.css

731 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

980 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

735 ms

jquery.ui.core.js

jquery.ui.core.js

786 ms

jquery.ui.widget.js

jquery.ui.widget.js

907 ms

jquery.ui.accordion.js

jquery.ui.accordion.js

974 ms

jquery-cookie.js

jquery-cookie.js

975 ms

ddsmoothmenu.js

ddsmoothmenu.js

981 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

1049 ms

colortip.js

colortip.js

1209 ms

tytabs.js

tytabs.js

1296 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

1219 ms

carousel.js

carousel.js

1223 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

1226 ms

jquery.tweet.js

jquery.tweet.js

2190 ms

jflickrfeed.min.js

jflickrfeed.min.js

1511 ms

social-options.js

social-options.js

1462 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

1467 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

1472 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

1620 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1707 ms

font.css

font.css

1390 ms

base.css

base.css

1395 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1492 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

1623 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

1628 ms

javascript.css

javascript.css

1635 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

1640 ms

white.css

white.css

1794 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1947 ms

rn1.jpg

rn1.jpg

19834 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

304 ms

AS.png

AS.png

979 ms

13Gf.png

13Gf.png

2343 ms

155.png

155.png

1461 ms

Roboto-Condensed-webfont.woff

Roboto-Condensed-webfont.woff

246 ms

Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff

Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff

803 ms

fontawesome-webfonte63c.woff

fontawesome-webfonte63c.woff

490 ms

fontellodfd5.woff

fontellodfd5.woff

735 ms

Roboto-Medium-webfont.woff

Roboto-Medium-webfont.woff

980 ms

Roboto-Bold-webfont.woff

Roboto-Bold-webfont.woff

1105 ms

Accessibility Review

rnsolar.in accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rnsolar.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rnsolar.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rnsolar.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rnsolar.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rnsolar.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RN SOLAR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: