Tools & Wizards About Us
road.to screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

road.to

road.to

Page Load Speed

862 ms in total

First Response

242 ms

Resources Loaded

521 ms

Page Rendered

99 ms

road.to screenshot

About Website

Visit road.to now to see the best up-to-date Road content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about road.to

road.to

Visit road.to

Key Findings

We analyzed Road.to page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 620 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

road.to performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

road.to

242 ms

main.css

80 ms

main.js

134 ms

ifr

21 ms

get.media

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Road.to, 25% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (1 request) were made to Gmodules.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (242 ms) belongs to the original domain Road.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.2 kB (35%)

Content Size

12.0 kB

After Optimization

7.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Road.to main page is 12.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 6.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 63% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 971 B

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 795 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 936 B
  • After compression 413 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Road.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 795 B or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Road. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

road.to

road.to

242 ms

main.css

main.css

80 ms

main.js

main.js

134 ms

ifr

ifr

21 ms

get.media

get.media

10 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

5 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

3 ms

roadto.gif

roadto.gif

140 ms

Accessibility Review

road.to accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

road.to best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

road.to SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Road.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Road.to main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

road.to

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Road. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: