Tools & Wizards About Us
roanokeautodetailing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

roanokeautodetailing.com

Page Load Speed

205 ms in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

58 ms

Page Rendered

94 ms

roanokeautodetailing.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to roanokeautodetailing.com homepage info - get ready to check Roanokeautodetailing best content right away, or after learning these important things about roanokeautodetailing.com

Visit roanokeautodetailing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Roanokeautodetailing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 152 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roanokeautodetailing.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roanokeautodetailing.com

53 ms

bblSwNqTX.js

4 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Roanokeautodetailing.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (53 ms) belongs to the original domain Roanokeautodetailing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 533 B (6%)

Content Size

9.3 kB

After Optimization

8.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Roanokeautodetailing.com main page is 9.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 8.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 295 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 776 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 295 B or 28% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 238 B

  • Original 8.3 kB
  • After minification 8.3 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roanokeautodetailing. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

roanokeautodetailing.com

roanokeautodetailing.com

53 ms

bblSwNqTX.js

bblSwNqTX.js

4 ms

Accessibility Review

roanokeautodetailing.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

roanokeautodetailing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

roanokeautodetailing.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roanokeautodetailing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Roanokeautodetailing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

roanokeautodetailing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Roanokeautodetailing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: